{"title":"Praepositinus of Cremona and William of Auxerre on Suppositio","authors":"Stephen F. Brown","doi":"10.1515/9783110685022-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Early medieval discussions of supposition begin with reflections on an early passage of the first chapter of St Augustine ’ s De Trinitate. Here Augustine is criticizing Sabellius and his followers who claimed that the Father had begotten himself, i.e. God begets deity, which gave rise to a kind of modalism. These words of Augustine show up in Peter Lombard ’ s Sentences , Book I, Distinction 4, and gave rise to a larger debate about the words that can properly apply to God which engaged the minds not least of Abelard and Alberic of Reims, culminating in Gilbert of Poitiers. Praepositinus (1135 – 1210) and William of Auxerre (1140 – 1231) are the sources of a new trajectory in interpreting the supposition of the name ‘ God ’ , which directly influ-ences the Summa Halensis. This paper examines the nature of that influence and provides a translation of brief texts from Prepositinus and William that form its back-ground. Early medieval discussions of supposition begin with reflections on an early passage St Augustine Here Augustine is criticizing Sabellius and his followers who claimed that the Father had begotten Himself. These words of Augustine show up in Peter Lombard ’ s Sentences , Book 1, Distinction 4, which opens with the question: Utrum Deus genuit Deum? ( ‘ Whether it is to be granted that God generated Himself? Peter Lombard into any historical detail, we examine the Theologia or Scholarium Abelard understanding, would hold on to their own opinion, which","PeriodicalId":153743,"journal":{"name":"The Summa Halensis","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Summa Halensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110685022-016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
中世纪早期关于假设的讨论始于对圣奥古斯丁的《三位一体论》第一章早期段落的反思。奥古斯丁在这里批评萨贝利乌斯和他的追随者,他们声称父亲生下了自己,即上帝生下了神,这导致了一种形态论。奥古斯丁的这些话出现在彼得·伦巴第的《句子》第一册,《区别》第四册,并引发了一场更大的争论,关于哪些词可以恰当地应用于上帝,这引起了兰斯的阿伯拉尔和阿尔伯里克的思考,最终在普瓦提埃的吉尔伯特身上达到高潮。Praepositinus(1135 - 1210)和William of Auxerre(1140 - 1231)是解释“上帝”这个名字的新轨迹的来源,这直接影响了《Halensis大全》。本文考察了这种影响的本质,并提供了介词和威廉的简短文本的翻译,构成了它的背景。中世纪早期关于假设的讨论开始于对一段早期文章的反思,这里,奥古斯丁在批评萨贝利乌斯和他的追随者,他们声称天父生下了自己。奥古斯丁的这些话出现在彼得·伦巴第的《句子》第一卷,《区别》第四卷,开篇的问题是:Utrum Deus genuit Deum?(“是否应该承认上帝创造了他自己?彼得·伦巴第的任何历史细节,我们考察的神学或学者阿伯拉尔的理解,会坚持自己的观点,这
Praepositinus of Cremona and William of Auxerre on Suppositio
: Early medieval discussions of supposition begin with reflections on an early passage of the first chapter of St Augustine ’ s De Trinitate. Here Augustine is criticizing Sabellius and his followers who claimed that the Father had begotten himself, i.e. God begets deity, which gave rise to a kind of modalism. These words of Augustine show up in Peter Lombard ’ s Sentences , Book I, Distinction 4, and gave rise to a larger debate about the words that can properly apply to God which engaged the minds not least of Abelard and Alberic of Reims, culminating in Gilbert of Poitiers. Praepositinus (1135 – 1210) and William of Auxerre (1140 – 1231) are the sources of a new trajectory in interpreting the supposition of the name ‘ God ’ , which directly influ-ences the Summa Halensis. This paper examines the nature of that influence and provides a translation of brief texts from Prepositinus and William that form its back-ground. Early medieval discussions of supposition begin with reflections on an early passage St Augustine Here Augustine is criticizing Sabellius and his followers who claimed that the Father had begotten Himself. These words of Augustine show up in Peter Lombard ’ s Sentences , Book 1, Distinction 4, which opens with the question: Utrum Deus genuit Deum? ( ‘ Whether it is to be granted that God generated Himself? Peter Lombard into any historical detail, we examine the Theologia or Scholarium Abelard understanding, would hold on to their own opinion, which