{"title":"使用特征选择验证(FSV)方法对散热器近场和远场的测量和计算进行比较","authors":"A. Bhobe, P. Sochoux","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2010.5711369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we outline the comparison of far field electric field of a Heatsink using the Frequency Selective Validation (FSV) method. Numerical simulations are performed using 3D-EM tools like Ansoft HFSS and CST Microstripes. The FSV method has been used to compare the data between the two different numerical approaches as well as with the measured data. Though the E-field data shows a good agreement between measurement and simulations, the FSV data analysis proves a poor to good agreement to measurements.","PeriodicalId":201448,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of measured and computed near and far fields of a Heatsink using the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) method\",\"authors\":\"A. Bhobe, P. Sochoux\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEMC.2010.5711369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we outline the comparison of far field electric field of a Heatsink using the Frequency Selective Validation (FSV) method. Numerical simulations are performed using 3D-EM tools like Ansoft HFSS and CST Microstripes. The FSV method has been used to compare the data between the two different numerical approaches as well as with the measured data. Though the E-field data shows a good agreement between measurement and simulations, the FSV data analysis proves a poor to good agreement to measurements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2010.5711369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2010.5711369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of measured and computed near and far fields of a Heatsink using the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) method
In this paper we outline the comparison of far field electric field of a Heatsink using the Frequency Selective Validation (FSV) method. Numerical simulations are performed using 3D-EM tools like Ansoft HFSS and CST Microstripes. The FSV method has been used to compare the data between the two different numerical approaches as well as with the measured data. Though the E-field data shows a good agreement between measurement and simulations, the FSV data analysis proves a poor to good agreement to measurements.