“我们不是女权主义者!”埃及女权主义女性活动家

N. Al-Ali
{"title":"“我们不是女权主义者!”埃及女权主义女性活动家","authors":"N. Al-Ali","doi":"10.14361/9783839400616-011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experimental and post-colonial anthropology has increasingly problematized the “pursuit of the other” (Visweswaran 1994: 20), power relations between researcher and informant as well as representation. Attempts to decolonize anthropology have been particularly notable with regard to feminist scholarship, which, by its very definition, needs to continually challenge the very notion of the canon. Nevertheless, not every feminist scholar doing research in the Arab world is as conscious of power relationships between cultures (colonizer / colonized) as s / he might be of power relations within culture (male / female). Therefore, an analysis of “positioning” is a key to understanding how many feminist ethnographers theorize. A new kind of feminist scholarship related to the “wind of cultural decolonization” (Morsy / Nelson / Saad / Sholkamy 1991) has taken different directions. One manifestation of this kind of research is marked by the various ways in which female ethnographers confront their biases as western women, feminists, or belonging to a particular class, religion, etc. Many anthropologists have pointed out that fieldwork is situated between autobiography and anthropology (Hastrup 1992) and that it connects a personal experience with a general field of knowledge. Fieldwork is not the unmediated world of “others”, but the world between ourselves and the others. The concept of “intersubjectivity” – the relationship between the researcher and the re-","PeriodicalId":317629,"journal":{"name":"Situating Globalization","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“We Are Not Feminists!” Egyptian Women Activists on Feminism\",\"authors\":\"N. Al-Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.14361/9783839400616-011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Experimental and post-colonial anthropology has increasingly problematized the “pursuit of the other” (Visweswaran 1994: 20), power relations between researcher and informant as well as representation. Attempts to decolonize anthropology have been particularly notable with regard to feminist scholarship, which, by its very definition, needs to continually challenge the very notion of the canon. Nevertheless, not every feminist scholar doing research in the Arab world is as conscious of power relationships between cultures (colonizer / colonized) as s / he might be of power relations within culture (male / female). Therefore, an analysis of “positioning” is a key to understanding how many feminist ethnographers theorize. A new kind of feminist scholarship related to the “wind of cultural decolonization” (Morsy / Nelson / Saad / Sholkamy 1991) has taken different directions. One manifestation of this kind of research is marked by the various ways in which female ethnographers confront their biases as western women, feminists, or belonging to a particular class, religion, etc. Many anthropologists have pointed out that fieldwork is situated between autobiography and anthropology (Hastrup 1992) and that it connects a personal experience with a general field of knowledge. Fieldwork is not the unmediated world of “others”, but the world between ourselves and the others. The concept of “intersubjectivity” – the relationship between the researcher and the re-\",\"PeriodicalId\":317629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Situating Globalization\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Situating Globalization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839400616-011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Situating Globalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839400616-011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实验人类学和后殖民人类学越来越质疑“对他者的追求”(Visweswaran 1994: 20)、研究者和信息提供者之间的权力关系以及代表性。人类学非殖民化的尝试在女权主义学术方面尤其引人注目,就其定义而言,女权主义需要不断挑战经典的概念。然而,并不是每个在阿拉伯世界做研究的女权主义学者都意识到文化之间的权力关系(殖民者/被殖民者),就像她/他可能意识到文化内部的权力关系(男性/女性)一样。因此,对“定位”的分析是理解许多女性主义民族志学者如何理论化的关键。一种与“文化非殖民化之风”(Morsy / Nelson / Saad / Sholkamy 1991)相关的新型女权主义学术已经采取了不同的方向。这类研究的一种表现形式是,女性民族学家以不同的方式面对自己作为西方女性、女权主义者或属于特定阶级、宗教等的偏见。许多人类学家指出,田野调查介于自传和人类学之间(Hastrup 1992),它将个人经验与一般的知识领域联系起来。田野工作不是“他者”的无中介世界,而是我们与他者之间的世界。“主体间性”的概念——研究者与被研究者之间的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“We Are Not Feminists!” Egyptian Women Activists on Feminism
Experimental and post-colonial anthropology has increasingly problematized the “pursuit of the other” (Visweswaran 1994: 20), power relations between researcher and informant as well as representation. Attempts to decolonize anthropology have been particularly notable with regard to feminist scholarship, which, by its very definition, needs to continually challenge the very notion of the canon. Nevertheless, not every feminist scholar doing research in the Arab world is as conscious of power relationships between cultures (colonizer / colonized) as s / he might be of power relations within culture (male / female). Therefore, an analysis of “positioning” is a key to understanding how many feminist ethnographers theorize. A new kind of feminist scholarship related to the “wind of cultural decolonization” (Morsy / Nelson / Saad / Sholkamy 1991) has taken different directions. One manifestation of this kind of research is marked by the various ways in which female ethnographers confront their biases as western women, feminists, or belonging to a particular class, religion, etc. Many anthropologists have pointed out that fieldwork is situated between autobiography and anthropology (Hastrup 1992) and that it connects a personal experience with a general field of knowledge. Fieldwork is not the unmediated world of “others”, but the world between ourselves and the others. The concept of “intersubjectivity” – the relationship between the researcher and the re-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信