困在“零风险”社会中又如何挣脱

D. Sornette, P. Cauwels
{"title":"困在“零风险”社会中又如何挣脱","authors":"D. Sornette, P. Cauwels","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3684550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We live in a ‘zero-risk society’, characterized by a culture that is obsessed with controlling and removing any possible risks. Obviously, one of the fundamental objectives of any civilization is to improve the safety and security of its citizens. However, we should not let the cozy comfort that comes with this progress let us fall into a doze. Human societies are intrinsically out-of-equilibrium, constantly exposed to endogenous and exogenous shocks, extreme events that may be known unknowns but even unknown unknowns. This may sound like a paradox, but, bold risk-taking is an essential ingredient of any resilient society. It is the only way to prepare for the totality of growing challenges that we are facing today. Unfortunately, the past decades have been characterized by technological stagnation, principally in discoveries and inventions, and more recently also in innovations, and by social, cultural, intellectual and institutional exhaustion. The authors attribute this to four deeper causes: (i) risk aversion as a consequence of increasing wealth and aging; (ii) technology creating an ‘illusion of control’; (iii) herding and imitation through social media and (iv) management shaped by extremes and over-reaction. The only way out of this trap is to promote a culture in education where failure is seen as part of the learning process, and aggressively fund explorative, high-risk projects, encourage playful, creative, even apparently useless tinkering. Finally, incentives and rewards should promote risk-takers, explorers and creative inventors in the same way as it does with social media influencers and Hollywood or sports stars. Our analyses call for massive creations of DARPA-like institutions and bold super Apollo-like projects to break free of the zero-risk = dying societies.","PeriodicalId":448175,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","volume":"36 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trapped in the “zero-risk” society and how to break free\",\"authors\":\"D. Sornette, P. Cauwels\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3684550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We live in a ‘zero-risk society’, characterized by a culture that is obsessed with controlling and removing any possible risks. Obviously, one of the fundamental objectives of any civilization is to improve the safety and security of its citizens. However, we should not let the cozy comfort that comes with this progress let us fall into a doze. Human societies are intrinsically out-of-equilibrium, constantly exposed to endogenous and exogenous shocks, extreme events that may be known unknowns but even unknown unknowns. This may sound like a paradox, but, bold risk-taking is an essential ingredient of any resilient society. It is the only way to prepare for the totality of growing challenges that we are facing today. Unfortunately, the past decades have been characterized by technological stagnation, principally in discoveries and inventions, and more recently also in innovations, and by social, cultural, intellectual and institutional exhaustion. The authors attribute this to four deeper causes: (i) risk aversion as a consequence of increasing wealth and aging; (ii) technology creating an ‘illusion of control’; (iii) herding and imitation through social media and (iv) management shaped by extremes and over-reaction. The only way out of this trap is to promote a culture in education where failure is seen as part of the learning process, and aggressively fund explorative, high-risk projects, encourage playful, creative, even apparently useless tinkering. Finally, incentives and rewards should promote risk-takers, explorers and creative inventors in the same way as it does with social media influencers and Hollywood or sports stars. Our analyses call for massive creations of DARPA-like institutions and bold super Apollo-like projects to break free of the zero-risk = dying societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal\",\"volume\":\"36 3\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3684550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

我们生活在一个“零风险社会”,其特点是一种痴迷于控制和消除任何可能风险的文化。显然,任何文明的基本目标之一是改善其公民的安全和保障。然而,我们不应该让这种进步带来的舒适让我们打瞌睡。人类社会本质上是不平衡的,不断受到内源性和外源性冲击,极端事件可能是已知的未知,但甚至是未知的未知。这听起来像是一个悖论,但是,大胆的冒险是任何有弹性的社会的基本要素。这是为我们今天面临的日益增多的挑战作好准备的唯一途径。不幸的是,过去几十年的特点是技术停滞,主要是在发现和发明方面,最近也在创新方面,以及社会、文化、智力和体制方面的枯竭。作者将此归因于四个更深层次的原因:(1)财富增长和老龄化导致的风险厌恶;(ii)制造“控制幻觉”的技术;(3)通过社交媒体的羊群和模仿;(4)极端和过度反应形成的管理。走出这个陷阱的唯一方法是在教育中推广一种文化,将失败视为学习过程的一部分,积极资助探索性、高风险的项目,鼓励好玩的、创造性的,甚至是看似无用的修补。最后,激励和奖励应该鼓励冒险者、探索者和有创造力的发明家,就像对待社交媒体影响者、好莱坞或体育明星一样。我们的分析呼吁大规模创建类似darpa的机构和大胆的超级阿波罗项目,以摆脱零风险=垂死的社会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trapped in the “zero-risk” society and how to break free
We live in a ‘zero-risk society’, characterized by a culture that is obsessed with controlling and removing any possible risks. Obviously, one of the fundamental objectives of any civilization is to improve the safety and security of its citizens. However, we should not let the cozy comfort that comes with this progress let us fall into a doze. Human societies are intrinsically out-of-equilibrium, constantly exposed to endogenous and exogenous shocks, extreme events that may be known unknowns but even unknown unknowns. This may sound like a paradox, but, bold risk-taking is an essential ingredient of any resilient society. It is the only way to prepare for the totality of growing challenges that we are facing today. Unfortunately, the past decades have been characterized by technological stagnation, principally in discoveries and inventions, and more recently also in innovations, and by social, cultural, intellectual and institutional exhaustion. The authors attribute this to four deeper causes: (i) risk aversion as a consequence of increasing wealth and aging; (ii) technology creating an ‘illusion of control’; (iii) herding and imitation through social media and (iv) management shaped by extremes and over-reaction. The only way out of this trap is to promote a culture in education where failure is seen as part of the learning process, and aggressively fund explorative, high-risk projects, encourage playful, creative, even apparently useless tinkering. Finally, incentives and rewards should promote risk-takers, explorers and creative inventors in the same way as it does with social media influencers and Hollywood or sports stars. Our analyses call for massive creations of DARPA-like institutions and bold super Apollo-like projects to break free of the zero-risk = dying societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信