非点源污染模型研究综述:现状与展望

Hossein Ahmadi
{"title":"非点源污染模型研究综述:现状与展望","authors":"Hossein Ahmadi","doi":"10.47363/jcert/2023(5)140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-point source (NPS) pollution control is an increasingly important topic in aquatic environment protection due to its significant adverse effect on water quality. Characterizing NPS pollution loads is crucial for preparing BMPs to improve water quality and protect the aquatic ecosystem. Modeling tools are commonly used for simulating NPS pollution in watersheds; however, the modeling process contains uncertainties and complications, which makes the prediction of NPS pollution loads challenging and complicated. To deal with this issue, significant progress has been made to address NPS pollution modeling problems in the past few decades. The current study reviews different approaches being used for NPS pollution modeling. In this context, the main methods in NPS modeling are described and classified into three categories. 1. Empirical models, 2. Physically based models, and 3. Simulation based optimization models. The present study contributes to fulfilling the gaps in the classification of NPS pollution modeling approaches and highlights the advantages and drawbacks of each approach in order to set a standard for choosing a proper simulation tool for estimating NPS pollution loads based on the limitations and requirements of the understudy circumstance","PeriodicalId":210581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Overview of Non-Point Source Pollution Modeling: Current Status and Future Prospect\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Ahmadi\",\"doi\":\"10.47363/jcert/2023(5)140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Non-point source (NPS) pollution control is an increasingly important topic in aquatic environment protection due to its significant adverse effect on water quality. Characterizing NPS pollution loads is crucial for preparing BMPs to improve water quality and protect the aquatic ecosystem. Modeling tools are commonly used for simulating NPS pollution in watersheds; however, the modeling process contains uncertainties and complications, which makes the prediction of NPS pollution loads challenging and complicated. To deal with this issue, significant progress has been made to address NPS pollution modeling problems in the past few decades. The current study reviews different approaches being used for NPS pollution modeling. In this context, the main methods in NPS modeling are described and classified into three categories. 1. Empirical models, 2. Physically based models, and 3. Simulation based optimization models. The present study contributes to fulfilling the gaps in the classification of NPS pollution modeling approaches and highlights the advantages and drawbacks of each approach in order to set a standard for choosing a proper simulation tool for estimating NPS pollution loads based on the limitations and requirements of the understudy circumstance\",\"PeriodicalId\":210581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47363/jcert/2023(5)140\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Engineering Research & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47363/jcert/2023(5)140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非点源污染因其对水质的严重影响而日益成为水生环境保护领域的重要课题。表征NPS污染负荷对于制定bmp以改善水质和保护水生生态系统至关重要。建模工具通常用于模拟流域的NPS污染;然而,建模过程中存在不确定性和复杂性,这使得NPS污染负荷的预测具有挑战性和复杂性。为了解决这一问题,在过去的几十年里,在解决NPS污染模型问题方面取得了重大进展。目前的研究回顾了用于NPS污染建模的不同方法。在此背景下,描述了NPS建模的主要方法,并将其分为三类。1. 实证模型;2 .基于物理的模型;基于仿真的优化模型。本研究有助于弥补NPS污染建模方法分类的空白,并突出每种方法的优缺点,以便根据被研究环境的限制和要求,为选择合适的模拟工具来估计NPS污染负荷设定标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Overview of Non-Point Source Pollution Modeling: Current Status and Future Prospect
Non-point source (NPS) pollution control is an increasingly important topic in aquatic environment protection due to its significant adverse effect on water quality. Characterizing NPS pollution loads is crucial for preparing BMPs to improve water quality and protect the aquatic ecosystem. Modeling tools are commonly used for simulating NPS pollution in watersheds; however, the modeling process contains uncertainties and complications, which makes the prediction of NPS pollution loads challenging and complicated. To deal with this issue, significant progress has been made to address NPS pollution modeling problems in the past few decades. The current study reviews different approaches being used for NPS pollution modeling. In this context, the main methods in NPS modeling are described and classified into three categories. 1. Empirical models, 2. Physically based models, and 3. Simulation based optimization models. The present study contributes to fulfilling the gaps in the classification of NPS pollution modeling approaches and highlights the advantages and drawbacks of each approach in order to set a standard for choosing a proper simulation tool for estimating NPS pollution loads based on the limitations and requirements of the understudy circumstance
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信