事件相关电位与记忆容量;有意学习模式与偶然学习模式的比较[j]。

H J Heinze, T F Münte, D E Dietrich, S M Bartusch, M B Scholz
{"title":"事件相关电位与记忆容量;有意学习模式与偶然学习模式的比较[j]。","authors":"H J Heinze,&nbsp;T F Münte,&nbsp;D E Dietrich,&nbsp;S M Bartusch,&nbsp;M B Scholz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Event-related brain potentials were recorded from healthy young adults during two paradigms calling for recall and recognition of previously presented words. In the first part of the study incidental learning was employed, i.e. the subject was unaware that he participated in a memory test and engaged in a semantic task instead. ERPs from the encoding phase were averaged according to whether a word was 1. subsequently recalled, 2. recognized or 3. neither recalled nor recognized. The intentional paradigm was identical in all respects except for the instructions to remember as many words as possible for subsequent memory testing. No semantic task was employed during intentional encoding. Both paradigms yielded significantly higher positivities for words which were later recalled.</p>","PeriodicalId":75812,"journal":{"name":"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete","volume":"21 2","pages":"82-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Event-related potentials and memory capacity: 1. A comparison of intentional and incidental learning modes].\",\"authors\":\"H J Heinze,&nbsp;T F Münte,&nbsp;D E Dietrich,&nbsp;S M Bartusch,&nbsp;M B Scholz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Event-related brain potentials were recorded from healthy young adults during two paradigms calling for recall and recognition of previously presented words. In the first part of the study incidental learning was employed, i.e. the subject was unaware that he participated in a memory test and engaged in a semantic task instead. ERPs from the encoding phase were averaged according to whether a word was 1. subsequently recalled, 2. recognized or 3. neither recalled nor recognized. The intentional paradigm was identical in all respects except for the instructions to remember as many words as possible for subsequent memory testing. No semantic task was employed during intentional encoding. Both paradigms yielded significantly higher positivities for words which were later recalled.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"82-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EEG-EMG Zeitschrift fur Elektroenzephalographie, Elektromyographie und verwandte Gebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在两种范式中,记录了健康年轻人的事件相关脑电位,要求回忆和识别先前呈现的单词。在研究的第一部分中,被试采用了附带学习,即被试没有意识到他参加了一个记忆测试,而是参加了一个语义任务。根据单词是否为1对编码阶段的erp进行平均。随后召回,2。认可或3。既不记得也不认识。除了要求在随后的记忆测试中记住尽可能多的单词外,意图范式在所有方面都是相同的。在有意编码过程中不使用语义任务。这两种范式对后来被回忆的单词都产生了显著更高的正性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Event-related potentials and memory capacity: 1. A comparison of intentional and incidental learning modes].

Event-related brain potentials were recorded from healthy young adults during two paradigms calling for recall and recognition of previously presented words. In the first part of the study incidental learning was employed, i.e. the subject was unaware that he participated in a memory test and engaged in a semantic task instead. ERPs from the encoding phase were averaged according to whether a word was 1. subsequently recalled, 2. recognized or 3. neither recalled nor recognized. The intentional paradigm was identical in all respects except for the instructions to remember as many words as possible for subsequent memory testing. No semantic task was employed during intentional encoding. Both paradigms yielded significantly higher positivities for words which were later recalled.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信