任人唯亲的世界中被俘获的董事会和破碎的治理——以印度为例

B. Balasubramanian
{"title":"任人唯亲的世界中被俘获的董事会和破碎的治理——以印度为例","authors":"B. Balasubramanian","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2907630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the largely emasculated role of corporate boards of directors in effectively discharging their fiduciary obligations of promoting and protecting the interests of absentee shareholders. Although legislation and regulation in India, through the Companies Act and Listing covenants especially after their reforms in 2013 and 2014, mandate stiff independence criteria to empower directors to better achieve the desired levels of protection of shareholder and other stakeholder interests, the structural design and composition processes of boards suffer from lethal vulnerabilities that inherently militate against due performance by non-management directors. It also documents the evolution of cronyism over the years, provides a stylised model of up-stream (with government) and down-stream (with directors) business cronyism, and concludes with some suggestions aimed at minimising its adverse impact on board and director independence.","PeriodicalId":306482,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Corporate Law Practice (Sub-Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Captured Boards and Fractured Governance in a World of Cronyism - The Case of India\",\"authors\":\"B. Balasubramanian\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2907630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the largely emasculated role of corporate boards of directors in effectively discharging their fiduciary obligations of promoting and protecting the interests of absentee shareholders. Although legislation and regulation in India, through the Companies Act and Listing covenants especially after their reforms in 2013 and 2014, mandate stiff independence criteria to empower directors to better achieve the desired levels of protection of shareholder and other stakeholder interests, the structural design and composition processes of boards suffer from lethal vulnerabilities that inherently militate against due performance by non-management directors. It also documents the evolution of cronyism over the years, provides a stylised model of up-stream (with government) and down-stream (with directors) business cronyism, and concludes with some suggestions aimed at minimising its adverse impact on board and director independence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Corporate Law Practice (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Corporate Law Practice (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2907630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Corporate Law Practice (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2907630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了公司董事会在有效履行促进和保护缺席股东利益的信义义务方面的弱化作用。尽管印度的立法和监管,特别是在2013年和2014年改革之后,通过《公司法》和《上市契约》,规定了严格的独立性标准,以授权董事更好地实现对股东和其他利益相关者利益的预期保护水平,但董事会的结构设计和组成过程存在致命的脆弱性,这些脆弱性本质上阻碍了非管理层董事的应有表现。它还记录了多年来任人唯亲的演变,提供了上游(与政府)和下游(与董事)商业任人唯亲的风格化模型,并提出了一些建议,旨在最大限度地减少其对董事会和董事独立性的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Captured Boards and Fractured Governance in a World of Cronyism - The Case of India
This paper examines the largely emasculated role of corporate boards of directors in effectively discharging their fiduciary obligations of promoting and protecting the interests of absentee shareholders. Although legislation and regulation in India, through the Companies Act and Listing covenants especially after their reforms in 2013 and 2014, mandate stiff independence criteria to empower directors to better achieve the desired levels of protection of shareholder and other stakeholder interests, the structural design and composition processes of boards suffer from lethal vulnerabilities that inherently militate against due performance by non-management directors. It also documents the evolution of cronyism over the years, provides a stylised model of up-stream (with government) and down-stream (with directors) business cronyism, and concludes with some suggestions aimed at minimising its adverse impact on board and director independence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信