Thiago Nascimento, U. Rivieccio, J. Martin Marcos, M. Spinks
{"title":"纳尔逊逻辑","authors":"Thiago Nascimento, U. Rivieccio, J. Martin Marcos, M. Spinks","doi":"10.1093/jigpal/jzaa015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Besides the better-known Nelson logic ($\\mathcal{N}3$) and paraconsistent Nelson logic ($\\mathcal{N}4$), in 1959 David Nelson introduced, with motivations of realizability and constructibility, a logic called $\\mathcal{S}$. The logic $\\mathcal{S}$ was originally presented by means of a calculus (crucially lacking the contraction rule) with infinitely many rule schemata and no semantics (other than the intended interpretation into Arithmetic). We look here at the propositional fragment of $\\mathcal{S}$, showing that it is algebraizable (in fact, implicative), in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi, with respect to a variety of three-potent involutive residuated lattices. We thus introduce the first known algebraic semantics for $\\mathcal{S}$ as well as a finite Hilbert-style calculus equivalent to Nelson’s presentation; this also allows us to clarify the relation between $\\mathcal{S}$ and the other two Nelson logics $\\mathcal{N}3$ and $\\mathcal{N}4$.","PeriodicalId":304915,"journal":{"name":"Log. J. IGPL","volume":"2013 13","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nelson's logic ℒ\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Nascimento, U. Rivieccio, J. Martin Marcos, M. Spinks\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jigpal/jzaa015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Besides the better-known Nelson logic ($\\\\mathcal{N}3$) and paraconsistent Nelson logic ($\\\\mathcal{N}4$), in 1959 David Nelson introduced, with motivations of realizability and constructibility, a logic called $\\\\mathcal{S}$. The logic $\\\\mathcal{S}$ was originally presented by means of a calculus (crucially lacking the contraction rule) with infinitely many rule schemata and no semantics (other than the intended interpretation into Arithmetic). We look here at the propositional fragment of $\\\\mathcal{S}$, showing that it is algebraizable (in fact, implicative), in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi, with respect to a variety of three-potent involutive residuated lattices. We thus introduce the first known algebraic semantics for $\\\\mathcal{S}$ as well as a finite Hilbert-style calculus equivalent to Nelson’s presentation; this also allows us to clarify the relation between $\\\\mathcal{S}$ and the other two Nelson logics $\\\\mathcal{N}3$ and $\\\\mathcal{N}4$.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Log. J. IGPL\",\"volume\":\"2013 13\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Log. J. IGPL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzaa015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Log. J. IGPL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzaa015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Besides the better-known Nelson logic ($\mathcal{N}3$) and paraconsistent Nelson logic ($\mathcal{N}4$), in 1959 David Nelson introduced, with motivations of realizability and constructibility, a logic called $\mathcal{S}$. The logic $\mathcal{S}$ was originally presented by means of a calculus (crucially lacking the contraction rule) with infinitely many rule schemata and no semantics (other than the intended interpretation into Arithmetic). We look here at the propositional fragment of $\mathcal{S}$, showing that it is algebraizable (in fact, implicative), in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi, with respect to a variety of three-potent involutive residuated lattices. We thus introduce the first known algebraic semantics for $\mathcal{S}$ as well as a finite Hilbert-style calculus equivalent to Nelson’s presentation; this also allows us to clarify the relation between $\mathcal{S}$ and the other two Nelson logics $\mathcal{N}3$ and $\mathcal{N}4$.