比较容器和虚拟机实现高可用性

Wubin Li, A. Kanso
{"title":"比较容器和虚拟机实现高可用性","authors":"Wubin Li, A. Kanso","doi":"10.1109/IC2E.2015.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent decades, virtualization as an abstraction from physical hardware has become a popular solution to resource isolation and server consolidation. With the surge in adoption of virtualization technologies, ensuring High Availability (HA) for applications hosted in virtualized environments emerges as an important problem and has garnered substantial attention. In this paper, we present a brief comparison of virtualization technologies from a HA perspective. The state-of-the-art HA solutions in two mainstream types of virtualized platforms (i.e., hypervisor-based platform and container-based platform) are respectively investigated in terms of limitations and features such as live migration, failure detection, and checkpoint/ restore. One of our key findings is that, compared with hypervisor-based platforms, HA features in container-based platforms are far from enough. From a HA perspective, extensions on top of container technologies are required.","PeriodicalId":395715,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Containers versus Virtual Machines for Achieving High Availability\",\"authors\":\"Wubin Li, A. Kanso\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IC2E.2015.79\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent decades, virtualization as an abstraction from physical hardware has become a popular solution to resource isolation and server consolidation. With the surge in adoption of virtualization technologies, ensuring High Availability (HA) for applications hosted in virtualized environments emerges as an important problem and has garnered substantial attention. In this paper, we present a brief comparison of virtualization technologies from a HA perspective. The state-of-the-art HA solutions in two mainstream types of virtualized platforms (i.e., hypervisor-based platform and container-based platform) are respectively investigated in terms of limitations and features such as live migration, failure detection, and checkpoint/ restore. One of our key findings is that, compared with hypervisor-based platforms, HA features in container-based platforms are far from enough. From a HA perspective, extensions on top of container technologies are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2015.79\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC2E.2015.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

近几十年来,作为物理硬件抽象的虚拟化已经成为资源隔离和服务器整合的流行解决方案。随着虚拟化技术的大量采用,确保托管在虚拟化环境中的应用程序的高可用性(HA)已成为一个重要问题,并引起了广泛关注。在本文中,我们从HA的角度对虚拟化技术进行了简要的比较。本文分别研究了两种主流虚拟化平台(即基于管理程序的平台和基于容器的平台)中最先进的HA解决方案的局限性和特性,如实时迁移、故障检测和检查点/恢复。我们的一个重要发现是,与基于管理程序的平台相比,基于容器的平台中的HA功能远远不够。从HA的角度来看,需要在容器技术之上进行扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Containers versus Virtual Machines for Achieving High Availability
In recent decades, virtualization as an abstraction from physical hardware has become a popular solution to resource isolation and server consolidation. With the surge in adoption of virtualization technologies, ensuring High Availability (HA) for applications hosted in virtualized environments emerges as an important problem and has garnered substantial attention. In this paper, we present a brief comparison of virtualization technologies from a HA perspective. The state-of-the-art HA solutions in two mainstream types of virtualized platforms (i.e., hypervisor-based platform and container-based platform) are respectively investigated in terms of limitations and features such as live migration, failure detection, and checkpoint/ restore. One of our key findings is that, compared with hypervisor-based platforms, HA features in container-based platforms are far from enough. From a HA perspective, extensions on top of container technologies are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信