从抽象和不可分辨到分类和类型:

J. Joinet, T. Seiller
{"title":"从抽象和不可分辨到分类和类型:","authors":"J. Joinet, T. Seiller","doi":"10.4216/JPSSJ.53.2_65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the end of the 19th century, the Peano School elaborated its famous theory of “definitions by abstraction”. Two decades later, Hermann Weyl elaborated a generalization of the former, termed “creative definitions”, capable of covering various cases of ideal elements (Peano’s abstracta being among them). If the Peano School proposal eventually appeared to be based on the nowadays standard classificatory process of quotienting a set by an equivalence, Weyl’s proposal still lacks a set-theoretical, classificatory interpretation. In this paper, we define and investigate the notion of relational indiscernibility (upon which Weyl’s creative definitions are based) and show that a bridge from the concept of indiscernibility to the notion of type (sets closed by bi-orthogonal) may be built from the observation that individuals are indiscernible exactly when they belong to exactly the same types. In the last part, we investigate some philosophical consequences of those observations concerning the theory of abstraction.","PeriodicalId":301300,"journal":{"name":"Kagaku Tetsugaku","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From abstraction and indiscernibility to classification and types:\",\"authors\":\"J. Joinet, T. Seiller\",\"doi\":\"10.4216/JPSSJ.53.2_65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the end of the 19th century, the Peano School elaborated its famous theory of “definitions by abstraction”. Two decades later, Hermann Weyl elaborated a generalization of the former, termed “creative definitions”, capable of covering various cases of ideal elements (Peano’s abstracta being among them). If the Peano School proposal eventually appeared to be based on the nowadays standard classificatory process of quotienting a set by an equivalence, Weyl’s proposal still lacks a set-theoretical, classificatory interpretation. In this paper, we define and investigate the notion of relational indiscernibility (upon which Weyl’s creative definitions are based) and show that a bridge from the concept of indiscernibility to the notion of type (sets closed by bi-orthogonal) may be built from the observation that individuals are indiscernible exactly when they belong to exactly the same types. In the last part, we investigate some philosophical consequences of those observations concerning the theory of abstraction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kagaku Tetsugaku\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kagaku Tetsugaku\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4216/JPSSJ.53.2_65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kagaku Tetsugaku","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4216/JPSSJ.53.2_65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

19世纪末,皮亚诺学派提出了著名的“抽象定义”理论。二十年后,赫尔曼·魏尔(Hermann Weyl)详细阐述了前者的概括,称为“创造性定义”,能够涵盖理想元素的各种情况(皮亚诺的抽象就是其中之一)。如果说皮亚诺学派的建议最终似乎是基于当今标准的分类过程,即通过等价引用一个集合,那么Weyl的建议仍然缺乏集合理论的分类解释。在本文中,我们定义和研究了关系不可分辨的概念(Weyl的创造性定义基于此),并表明从不可分辨的概念到类型(双正交封闭的集合)的概念之间的桥梁可以从个体在完全属于相同类型时完全不可分辨的观察中建立起来。在最后一部分,我们探讨了这些关于抽象理论的观察的一些哲学后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From abstraction and indiscernibility to classification and types:
At the end of the 19th century, the Peano School elaborated its famous theory of “definitions by abstraction”. Two decades later, Hermann Weyl elaborated a generalization of the former, termed “creative definitions”, capable of covering various cases of ideal elements (Peano’s abstracta being among them). If the Peano School proposal eventually appeared to be based on the nowadays standard classificatory process of quotienting a set by an equivalence, Weyl’s proposal still lacks a set-theoretical, classificatory interpretation. In this paper, we define and investigate the notion of relational indiscernibility (upon which Weyl’s creative definitions are based) and show that a bridge from the concept of indiscernibility to the notion of type (sets closed by bi-orthogonal) may be built from the observation that individuals are indiscernible exactly when they belong to exactly the same types. In the last part, we investigate some philosophical consequences of those observations concerning the theory of abstraction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信