超越独立相关性:子主题检索的方法和评价指标

ChengXiang Zhai, William W. Cohen, J. Lafferty
{"title":"超越独立相关性:子主题检索的方法和评价指标","authors":"ChengXiang Zhai, William W. Cohen, J. Lafferty","doi":"10.1145/860435.860440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a non-traditional retrieval problem we call subtopic retrieval. The subtopic retrieval problem is concerned with finding documents that cover many different subtopics of a query topic. In such a problem, the utility of a document in a ranking is dependent on other documents in the ranking, violating the assumption of independent relevance which is assumed in most traditional retrieval methods. Subtopic retrieval poses challenges for evaluating performance, as well as for developing effective algorithms. We propose a framework for evaluating subtopic retrieval which generalizes the traditional precision and recall metrics by accounting for intrinsic topic difficulty as well as redundancy in documents. We propose and systematically evaluate several methods for performing subtopic retrieval using statistical language models and a maximal marginal relevance (MMR) ranking strategy. A mixture model combined with query likelihood relevance ranking is shown to modestly outperform a baseline relevance ranking on a data set used in the TREC interactive track.","PeriodicalId":209809,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"512","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond independent relevance: methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval\",\"authors\":\"ChengXiang Zhai, William W. Cohen, J. Lafferty\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/860435.860440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present a non-traditional retrieval problem we call subtopic retrieval. The subtopic retrieval problem is concerned with finding documents that cover many different subtopics of a query topic. In such a problem, the utility of a document in a ranking is dependent on other documents in the ranking, violating the assumption of independent relevance which is assumed in most traditional retrieval methods. Subtopic retrieval poses challenges for evaluating performance, as well as for developing effective algorithms. We propose a framework for evaluating subtopic retrieval which generalizes the traditional precision and recall metrics by accounting for intrinsic topic difficulty as well as redundancy in documents. We propose and systematically evaluate several methods for performing subtopic retrieval using statistical language models and a maximal marginal relevance (MMR) ranking strategy. A mixture model combined with query likelihood relevance ranking is shown to modestly outperform a baseline relevance ranking on a data set used in the TREC interactive track.\",\"PeriodicalId\":209809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"512\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/860435.860440\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/860435.860440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 512

摘要

我们提出了一个非传统的检索问题,我们称之为子主题检索。子主题检索问题涉及查找涵盖查询主题的许多不同子主题的文档。在这个问题中,排名中的文档的效用依赖于排名中的其他文档,这违反了大多数传统检索方法中假设的独立相关性。子主题检索对性能评估以及开发有效的算法提出了挑战。我们提出了一个评估子主题检索的框架,该框架通过考虑文档中固有的主题难度和冗余来推广传统的精度和召回度量。我们提出并系统地评估了几种使用统计语言模型和最大边际相关性(MMR)排序策略进行子主题检索的方法。结合查询可能性相关性排序的混合模型在TREC交互式轨道中使用的数据集上略微优于基线相关性排序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond independent relevance: methods and evaluation metrics for subtopic retrieval
We present a non-traditional retrieval problem we call subtopic retrieval. The subtopic retrieval problem is concerned with finding documents that cover many different subtopics of a query topic. In such a problem, the utility of a document in a ranking is dependent on other documents in the ranking, violating the assumption of independent relevance which is assumed in most traditional retrieval methods. Subtopic retrieval poses challenges for evaluating performance, as well as for developing effective algorithms. We propose a framework for evaluating subtopic retrieval which generalizes the traditional precision and recall metrics by accounting for intrinsic topic difficulty as well as redundancy in documents. We propose and systematically evaluate several methods for performing subtopic retrieval using statistical language models and a maximal marginal relevance (MMR) ranking strategy. A mixture model combined with query likelihood relevance ranking is shown to modestly outperform a baseline relevance ranking on a data set used in the TREC interactive track.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信