经济与社会权利:法院在中国的角色

R. Peerenboom
{"title":"经济与社会权利:法院在中国的角色","authors":"R. Peerenboom","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1693613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compared to the average lower-middle income country, China has done relatively well on most social and economic indicators. Chinese courts however have generally played a limited, and rather ineffectual, role in implementing economic and social rights (ESR). The UN Committee for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has strongly urged China to make greater use of the courts in implementing ESR. This article considers what the role of the courts could and should be in implementing ESR in China. Part I surveys recent global developments giving greater bite to economic and social rights, as well as some of the main controversies, debates, and approaches to promoting, protecting and fulfilling ESR, with particular attention to the role of the courts. Part II provides a general introduction to the social, legal, political and economic context in China, and contrasts the situation in China with South Africa, one of the global leaders in judicial implementation of ESR. The overall environment in China is if not hostile, at least not promising, for a robust role for the courts in protecting ESR. Nevertheless, there is still some room for the courts to play a positive role in implementing ESR. Part III provides policy recommendations regarding the way forward. Part IV concludes.","PeriodicalId":126809,"journal":{"name":"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic and Social Rights: The Role of Courts in China\",\"authors\":\"R. Peerenboom\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1693613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compared to the average lower-middle income country, China has done relatively well on most social and economic indicators. Chinese courts however have generally played a limited, and rather ineffectual, role in implementing economic and social rights (ESR). The UN Committee for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has strongly urged China to make greater use of the courts in implementing ESR. This article considers what the role of the courts could and should be in implementing ESR in China. Part I surveys recent global developments giving greater bite to economic and social rights, as well as some of the main controversies, debates, and approaches to promoting, protecting and fulfilling ESR, with particular attention to the role of the courts. Part II provides a general introduction to the social, legal, political and economic context in China, and contrasts the situation in China with South Africa, one of the global leaders in judicial implementation of ESR. The overall environment in China is if not hostile, at least not promising, for a robust role for the courts in protecting ESR. Nevertheless, there is still some room for the courts to play a positive role in implementing ESR. Part III provides policy recommendations regarding the way forward. Part IV concludes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1693613\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Democratization: Building States & Democratic Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1693613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

与平均中低收入国家相比,中国在大多数社会和经济指标上做得相对较好。然而,中国法院在实现经济和社会权利方面的作用普遍有限,甚至是无效的。联合国经济、社会和文化权利委员会强烈敦促中国在落实ESR方面更多地利用法院。本文探讨了法院在中国实施ESR过程中可以发挥和应该发挥的作用。第一部分概述了最近全球发展对经济和社会权利的影响,以及促进、保护和实现经济和社会权利的一些主要争议、辩论和方法,特别关注法院的作用。第二部分概述了中国的社会、法律、政治和经济背景,并将中国的情况与南非的情况进行了对比,南非是司法实施ESR的全球领导者之一。对于法院在保护ESR方面发挥强有力的作用来说,中国的整体环境如果不是充满敌意,至少是没有希望的。然而,法院在实施ESR方面仍有发挥积极作用的空间。第三部分提供了关于未来道路的政策建议。第四部分是结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic and Social Rights: The Role of Courts in China
Compared to the average lower-middle income country, China has done relatively well on most social and economic indicators. Chinese courts however have generally played a limited, and rather ineffectual, role in implementing economic and social rights (ESR). The UN Committee for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights has strongly urged China to make greater use of the courts in implementing ESR. This article considers what the role of the courts could and should be in implementing ESR in China. Part I surveys recent global developments giving greater bite to economic and social rights, as well as some of the main controversies, debates, and approaches to promoting, protecting and fulfilling ESR, with particular attention to the role of the courts. Part II provides a general introduction to the social, legal, political and economic context in China, and contrasts the situation in China with South Africa, one of the global leaders in judicial implementation of ESR. The overall environment in China is if not hostile, at least not promising, for a robust role for the courts in protecting ESR. Nevertheless, there is still some room for the courts to play a positive role in implementing ESR. Part III provides policy recommendations regarding the way forward. Part IV concludes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信