评估现代金融市场监管模式的有效性

Е. А. Исаева, Юлия Георгиевна Лещенко
{"title":"评估现代金融市场监管模式的有效性","authors":"Е. А. Исаева, Юлия Георгиевна Лещенко","doi":"10.18334/ce.13.10.40967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article touches upon the problem of regulation of modern financial markets. The authors consider the models of regulation of financial markets used in world practice: institutional by the example of China, integrated by the example of Germany, functional by the example of France, and the Twin Peaks model by the example of Australia. The advantages and disadvantages of each of them are identified. For clarity, indicators of the functioning and regulation of the financial markets of the countries studied are given. Particular attention is paid to improving the effectiveness of financial regulation models.\n","PeriodicalId":338161,"journal":{"name":"Creative Economy","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the effectiveness of modern models of regulation of financial markets\",\"authors\":\"Е. А. Исаева, Юлия Георгиевна Лещенко\",\"doi\":\"10.18334/ce.13.10.40967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article touches upon the problem of regulation of modern financial markets. The authors consider the models of regulation of financial markets used in world practice: institutional by the example of China, integrated by the example of Germany, functional by the example of France, and the Twin Peaks model by the example of Australia. The advantages and disadvantages of each of them are identified. For clarity, indicators of the functioning and regulation of the financial markets of the countries studied are given. Particular attention is paid to improving the effectiveness of financial regulation models.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":338161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Creative Economy\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Creative Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.13.10.40967\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18334/ce.13.10.40967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这篇文章涉及到现代金融市场的监管问题。作者考虑了世界实践中使用的金融市场监管模式:以中国为例的机构模式,以德国为例的整合模式,以法国为例的功能模式,以及以澳大利亚为例的双峰模式。确定了每种方法的优点和缺点。为清楚起见,给出了所研究国家金融市场运作和监管的指标。特别注意提高金融监管模式的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the effectiveness of modern models of regulation of financial markets
The article touches upon the problem of regulation of modern financial markets. The authors consider the models of regulation of financial markets used in world practice: institutional by the example of China, integrated by the example of Germany, functional by the example of France, and the Twin Peaks model by the example of Australia. The advantages and disadvantages of each of them are identified. For clarity, indicators of the functioning and regulation of the financial markets of the countries studied are given. Particular attention is paid to improving the effectiveness of financial regulation models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信