基于不同媒体格式的在线学生提问对小学生英语词汇学习的影响

Fu-Yun Yu, Jhih-Yu Shiu
{"title":"基于不同媒体格式的在线学生提问对小学生英语词汇学习的影响","authors":"Fu-Yun Yu, Jhih-Yu Shiu","doi":"10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The student-generated questions (SGQs) approach has received increasing attention over recent decades, and empirical evidence has generally substantiated its positive learning effects. Despite this, existing evidence mostly comes from studies engaging students to generate questions based on a given text. In consideration that different structures and information specifications are revealed when materials are presented in graphical and textual forms, and literature has generally supported multimedia learning effects, the effects of online SGQs based on different media formats were examined. Specifically, the comparative effects of text-based, picture-based, text/picture-based for online SGQs activities on English academic achievement and SGQ task performance were investigated via a quasi-experimental research design. Six classes of sixth-graders (n = 138) participated in the online SGQs activity for eight weeks. The analysis of the covariance technique conducted on the data collected found nonsignificant differences among the three different treatment conditions in both learning outcomes. Explanations were rendered to shed light on the unexpected findings.","PeriodicalId":221464,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of online student-generated questions based on different media formats on elementary school student English vocabulary learning\",\"authors\":\"Fu-Yun Yu, Jhih-Yu Shiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The student-generated questions (SGQs) approach has received increasing attention over recent decades, and empirical evidence has generally substantiated its positive learning effects. Despite this, existing evidence mostly comes from studies engaging students to generate questions based on a given text. In consideration that different structures and information specifications are revealed when materials are presented in graphical and textual forms, and literature has generally supported multimedia learning effects, the effects of online SGQs based on different media formats were examined. Specifically, the comparative effects of text-based, picture-based, text/picture-based for online SGQs activities on English academic achievement and SGQ task performance were investigated via a quasi-experimental research design. Six classes of sixth-graders (n = 138) participated in the online SGQs activity for eight weeks. The analysis of the covariance technique conducted on the data collected found nonsignificant differences among the three different treatment conditions in both learning outcomes. Explanations were rendered to shed light on the unexpected findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00073\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT55010.2022.00073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,学生生成问题(SGQs)方法受到越来越多的关注,经验证据普遍证实了其积极的学习效果。尽管如此,现有的证据主要来自于让学生根据给定文本提出问题的研究。考虑到当材料以图形和文本形式呈现时,会显示不同的结构和信息规范,并且文献一般支持多媒体学习效果,我们研究了基于不同媒体格式的在线SGQs的效果。具体而言,通过准实验研究设计,比较了基于文本、基于图片、基于文本/图片的在线SGQ活动对英语学业成绩和SGQ任务绩效的影响。6个班的六年级学生(n = 138)参加了为期8周的在线SGQs活动。对收集的数据进行协方差分析发现,三种不同的治疗条件在两种学习结果上均无显著差异。解释是为了阐明那些意外的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of online student-generated questions based on different media formats on elementary school student English vocabulary learning
The student-generated questions (SGQs) approach has received increasing attention over recent decades, and empirical evidence has generally substantiated its positive learning effects. Despite this, existing evidence mostly comes from studies engaging students to generate questions based on a given text. In consideration that different structures and information specifications are revealed when materials are presented in graphical and textual forms, and literature has generally supported multimedia learning effects, the effects of online SGQs based on different media formats were examined. Specifically, the comparative effects of text-based, picture-based, text/picture-based for online SGQs activities on English academic achievement and SGQ task performance were investigated via a quasi-experimental research design. Six classes of sixth-graders (n = 138) participated in the online SGQs activity for eight weeks. The analysis of the covariance technique conducted on the data collected found nonsignificant differences among the three different treatment conditions in both learning outcomes. Explanations were rendered to shed light on the unexpected findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信