阿拉伯研究的思维方式:对阿拉伯教育信息网络(Shamaa)研究的分析

ةيلودلا ةلجملا, قوفتلا ريوطتل
{"title":"阿拉伯研究的思维方式:对阿拉伯教育信息网络(Shamaa)研究的分析","authors":"ةيلودلا ةلجملا, قوفتلا ريوطتل","doi":"10.20428/ijtd.v13i1.2003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to analyze the content of studies that dealt with \"thinking styles\" in the Arab Educational Information Network (Shamaa). The study used content-based analysis, and the sample covered (50) studies. A tool was developed for data collection. The study results revealed that there was a growth in studies of thinking styles, but this growth was fluctuating. Most of the studies (96%) were published in journals, (66%) were published by single researchers, (57.53%) of the publications were published by male researchers and (40%) of the studies were conducted in Saudi Arabia and Algeria. Furthermore, (34%) of the studies tackled the subject of thinking styles in general without other variables, (78%) focused on students, (44%) focused on the university level, (96%) of them used the descriptive method, (58%) made use of small samples, (66%) relied on Sternberg's Mental Self-Government and (48%) of them used Sternberg's Thinking Styles Inventory. The study concluded with stressing the need to codify standards in the local environment and to pay attention to cross-cultural studies.","PeriodicalId":413991,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal for Talent Development","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thinking Styles in Arab Research: An Analysis of the Studies in the Arab Educational Information Network (Shamaa)\",\"authors\":\"ةيلودلا ةلجملا, قوفتلا ريوطتل\",\"doi\":\"10.20428/ijtd.v13i1.2003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to analyze the content of studies that dealt with \\\"thinking styles\\\" in the Arab Educational Information Network (Shamaa). The study used content-based analysis, and the sample covered (50) studies. A tool was developed for data collection. The study results revealed that there was a growth in studies of thinking styles, but this growth was fluctuating. Most of the studies (96%) were published in journals, (66%) were published by single researchers, (57.53%) of the publications were published by male researchers and (40%) of the studies were conducted in Saudi Arabia and Algeria. Furthermore, (34%) of the studies tackled the subject of thinking styles in general without other variables, (78%) focused on students, (44%) focused on the university level, (96%) of them used the descriptive method, (58%) made use of small samples, (66%) relied on Sternberg's Mental Self-Government and (48%) of them used Sternberg's Thinking Styles Inventory. The study concluded with stressing the need to codify standards in the local environment and to pay attention to cross-cultural studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The International Journal for Talent Development\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The International Journal for Talent Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20428/ijtd.v13i1.2003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal for Talent Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20428/ijtd.v13i1.2003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在分析阿拉伯教育信息网络(Shamaa)中有关“思维方式”的研究内容。该研究采用了基于内容的分析,样本涵盖了(50)项研究。开发了一种数据收集工具。研究结果显示,对思维方式的研究有所增长,但这种增长是波动的。大多数研究(96%)发表在期刊上,(66%)由单个研究人员发表,(57.53%)由男性研究人员发表,(40%)在沙特阿拉伯和阿尔及利亚进行。此外,(34%)的研究在没有其他变量的情况下解决了一般思维方式的问题,(78%)关注学生,(44%)关注大学水平,(96%)使用描述性方法,(58%)使用小样本,(66%)依赖于斯滕伯格的心理自治,(48%)他们使用斯滕伯格的思维方式清单。该研究最后强调需要在当地环境中编纂标准,并注意跨文化研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thinking Styles in Arab Research: An Analysis of the Studies in the Arab Educational Information Network (Shamaa)
The study aimed to analyze the content of studies that dealt with "thinking styles" in the Arab Educational Information Network (Shamaa). The study used content-based analysis, and the sample covered (50) studies. A tool was developed for data collection. The study results revealed that there was a growth in studies of thinking styles, but this growth was fluctuating. Most of the studies (96%) were published in journals, (66%) were published by single researchers, (57.53%) of the publications were published by male researchers and (40%) of the studies were conducted in Saudi Arabia and Algeria. Furthermore, (34%) of the studies tackled the subject of thinking styles in general without other variables, (78%) focused on students, (44%) focused on the university level, (96%) of them used the descriptive method, (58%) made use of small samples, (66%) relied on Sternberg's Mental Self-Government and (48%) of them used Sternberg's Thinking Styles Inventory. The study concluded with stressing the need to codify standards in the local environment and to pay attention to cross-cultural studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信