预测非英语母语CS1学生学习成绩的计算机术语测试

Suad Alaofi, Seán Russell
{"title":"预测非英语母语CS1学生学习成绩的计算机术语测试","authors":"Suad Alaofi, Seán Russell","doi":"10.1145/3511861.3511876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the validity and efficacy of an English computer terminology multiple-choice test. The test was developed to investigate the relationship between non-native English-speaking students’ knowledge of computer terminology and their academic performance in CS1 courses. In this research, the Rasch model was used to find empirical evidence of test validity. Six aspects of construct validity were evaluated: content, substantive, structural, generalisability, external and consequential aspects. Based on analyses of 150 students’ responses, the test shows an acceptable level of validity in all six aspects of construct validity. Moreover, the efficacy of using this test to predict the students’ academic performance in CS1 courses was investigated. Statistical analysis of the data shows that the computer terminology test can predict approximately 50% of final exam performance in CS1 courses after controlling the impact of English proficiency. The aim of this research (along with other ongoing research) is to aid in the identification of non-native English-speaking students who require more specific language support. Additionally, the research will guide the development of resources and tools that can help these students.","PeriodicalId":175694,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Validated Computer Terminology Test for Predicting Non-native English-speaking CS1 Students’ Academic Performance\",\"authors\":\"Suad Alaofi, Seán Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3511861.3511876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research examines the validity and efficacy of an English computer terminology multiple-choice test. The test was developed to investigate the relationship between non-native English-speaking students’ knowledge of computer terminology and their academic performance in CS1 courses. In this research, the Rasch model was used to find empirical evidence of test validity. Six aspects of construct validity were evaluated: content, substantive, structural, generalisability, external and consequential aspects. Based on analyses of 150 students’ responses, the test shows an acceptable level of validity in all six aspects of construct validity. Moreover, the efficacy of using this test to predict the students’ academic performance in CS1 courses was investigated. Statistical analysis of the data shows that the computer terminology test can predict approximately 50% of final exam performance in CS1 courses after controlling the impact of English proficiency. The aim of this research (along with other ongoing research) is to aid in the identification of non-native English-speaking students who require more specific language support. Additionally, the research will guide the development of resources and tools that can help these students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Australasian Computing Education Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511861.3511876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究考察了英语计算机术语多项选择题的效度和有效性。本测验旨在探讨非英语母语学生的计算机术语知识与其CS1课程学习成绩之间的关系。本研究采用Rasch模型寻找检验效度的经验证据。从内容、实质、结构、概括性、外在和结果性六个方面评价构念效度。根据对150名学生回答的分析,该测试在构念效度的六个方面都显示出可接受的效度水平。此外,本研究还探讨了用该测验预测学生CS1课程学习成绩的效果。对数据的统计分析表明,在控制了英语水平的影响后,计算机术语测试可以预测CS1课程中大约50%的期末考试成绩。这项研究(以及其他正在进行的研究)的目的是帮助识别那些需要更具体语言支持的非英语母语学生。此外,这项研究将指导可以帮助这些学生的资源和工具的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Validated Computer Terminology Test for Predicting Non-native English-speaking CS1 Students’ Academic Performance
This research examines the validity and efficacy of an English computer terminology multiple-choice test. The test was developed to investigate the relationship between non-native English-speaking students’ knowledge of computer terminology and their academic performance in CS1 courses. In this research, the Rasch model was used to find empirical evidence of test validity. Six aspects of construct validity were evaluated: content, substantive, structural, generalisability, external and consequential aspects. Based on analyses of 150 students’ responses, the test shows an acceptable level of validity in all six aspects of construct validity. Moreover, the efficacy of using this test to predict the students’ academic performance in CS1 courses was investigated. Statistical analysis of the data shows that the computer terminology test can predict approximately 50% of final exam performance in CS1 courses after controlling the impact of English proficiency. The aim of this research (along with other ongoing research) is to aid in the identification of non-native English-speaking students who require more specific language support. Additionally, the research will guide the development of resources and tools that can help these students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信