处理基于统计和概率的关于社会背景的主张——批判性思维是关键和结果

Einav Aizikovitsh-Udi, S. Kuntze
{"title":"处理基于统计和概率的关于社会背景的主张——批判性思维是关键和结果","authors":"Einav Aizikovitsh-Udi, S. Kuntze","doi":"10.52041/srap.16701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When learners work with statistics about society, both Statistical Thinking (ST) and Critical Thinking (CT) should be in the focus. For dealing with data about society in a reflected way, CT is a key for a better understanding, but also for using and acquiring ST strategies. Conversely, there are findings that CT can be fostered through learning opportunities focused in ST and based on statistics about society. Looking at these findings, it appears that Critical Thinking can be a key for interpretation of data about society as it may, for instance, open up the way to helpful questions and for evaluating data-based claims about society contexts. At the same time, improved Critical Thinking skills can be a consequence of working with statistics and probability related to society contexts. Indeed, also the theoretical frameworks of Critical Thinking (CT) and Statistical Thinking (ST) suggest an overlap – however, both on the theoretical level and on the empirical level, this overlap has hardly been subject to systematic research. There is hence a research need related to key learner variables for their work with statistics about society. Correspondingly, we refer to and discuss selected findings from theoretical analyses and from two empirical projects. The theoretical analyses start from two sides: On the one side, theoretical approaches to ST with a solid empirical foundation are explored (e.g. Watson & Callingham, 2003) and related to theoretical conceptualizations in the domain of on the one side (e.g. Lipman, 1991). However, as CT approaches are very diverse, the perspective needs to be focused. For such foci, two complementary studies con provide help. A first study (Aizikovitsh-Udi, 2011) examined how certain aspects of CT can be fostered through an intervention with emphasis on probability (and related to society contexts), and a second study (e.g. Aizikovitsh-Udi & Kuntze, 2014) explores which role the use of CT strategies can play in the solution of tasks that require ST.","PeriodicalId":165958,"journal":{"name":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","volume":"212 12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Working with claims about society contexts based on statistics and probability - critical thinking as a key and as a consequence\",\"authors\":\"Einav Aizikovitsh-Udi, S. Kuntze\",\"doi\":\"10.52041/srap.16701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When learners work with statistics about society, both Statistical Thinking (ST) and Critical Thinking (CT) should be in the focus. For dealing with data about society in a reflected way, CT is a key for a better understanding, but also for using and acquiring ST strategies. Conversely, there are findings that CT can be fostered through learning opportunities focused in ST and based on statistics about society. Looking at these findings, it appears that Critical Thinking can be a key for interpretation of data about society as it may, for instance, open up the way to helpful questions and for evaluating data-based claims about society contexts. At the same time, improved Critical Thinking skills can be a consequence of working with statistics and probability related to society contexts. Indeed, also the theoretical frameworks of Critical Thinking (CT) and Statistical Thinking (ST) suggest an overlap – however, both on the theoretical level and on the empirical level, this overlap has hardly been subject to systematic research. There is hence a research need related to key learner variables for their work with statistics about society. Correspondingly, we refer to and discuss selected findings from theoretical analyses and from two empirical projects. The theoretical analyses start from two sides: On the one side, theoretical approaches to ST with a solid empirical foundation are explored (e.g. Watson & Callingham, 2003) and related to theoretical conceptualizations in the domain of on the one side (e.g. Lipman, 1991). However, as CT approaches are very diverse, the perspective needs to be focused. For such foci, two complementary studies con provide help. A first study (Aizikovitsh-Udi, 2011) examined how certain aspects of CT can be fostered through an intervention with emphasis on probability (and related to society contexts), and a second study (e.g. Aizikovitsh-Udi & Kuntze, 2014) explores which role the use of CT strategies can play in the solution of tasks that require ST.\",\"PeriodicalId\":165958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference\",\"volume\":\"212 12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.16701\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Promoting Understanding of Statistics about Society IASE Roundtable Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/srap.16701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当学习者学习有关社会的统计数据时,统计思维(ST)和批判性思维(CT)都应该成为重点。为了以一种反思的方式处理社会数据,CT是更好地理解的关键,也是使用和获取ST策略的关键。相反,也有研究发现,CT可以通过以ST为重点的学习机会和基于社会统计数据来培养。看看这些发现,似乎批判性思维可以成为解释社会数据的关键,例如,它可以为有用的问题开辟道路,并评估基于数据的关于社会背景的主张。与此同时,提高批判性思维技能可能是与社会背景相关的统计和概率工作的结果。事实上,批判性思维(CT)和统计思维(ST)的理论框架也表明存在重叠——然而,无论是在理论层面还是在实证层面,这种重叠几乎没有受到系统研究的影响。因此,他们需要研究与社会统计相关的关键学习者变量。相应地,我们参考并讨论了从理论分析和两个实证项目中选择的发现。理论分析从两个方面开始:一方面,探索具有坚实经验基础的ST的理论方法(例如Watson & Callingham, 2003),另一方面与领域的理论概念化相关(例如Lipman, 1991)。然而,由于CT方法非常多样化,因此需要集中视角。对于这样的焦点,两个互补的研究可以提供帮助。第一项研究(Aizikovitsh-Udi, 2011)研究了如何通过强调概率(以及与社会背景相关)的干预来培养CT的某些方面,第二项研究(例如Aizikovitsh-Udi & Kuntze, 2014)探讨了使用CT策略在解决需要ST的任务中可以发挥的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Working with claims about society contexts based on statistics and probability - critical thinking as a key and as a consequence
When learners work with statistics about society, both Statistical Thinking (ST) and Critical Thinking (CT) should be in the focus. For dealing with data about society in a reflected way, CT is a key for a better understanding, but also for using and acquiring ST strategies. Conversely, there are findings that CT can be fostered through learning opportunities focused in ST and based on statistics about society. Looking at these findings, it appears that Critical Thinking can be a key for interpretation of data about society as it may, for instance, open up the way to helpful questions and for evaluating data-based claims about society contexts. At the same time, improved Critical Thinking skills can be a consequence of working with statistics and probability related to society contexts. Indeed, also the theoretical frameworks of Critical Thinking (CT) and Statistical Thinking (ST) suggest an overlap – however, both on the theoretical level and on the empirical level, this overlap has hardly been subject to systematic research. There is hence a research need related to key learner variables for their work with statistics about society. Correspondingly, we refer to and discuss selected findings from theoretical analyses and from two empirical projects. The theoretical analyses start from two sides: On the one side, theoretical approaches to ST with a solid empirical foundation are explored (e.g. Watson & Callingham, 2003) and related to theoretical conceptualizations in the domain of on the one side (e.g. Lipman, 1991). However, as CT approaches are very diverse, the perspective needs to be focused. For such foci, two complementary studies con provide help. A first study (Aizikovitsh-Udi, 2011) examined how certain aspects of CT can be fostered through an intervention with emphasis on probability (and related to society contexts), and a second study (e.g. Aizikovitsh-Udi & Kuntze, 2014) explores which role the use of CT strategies can play in the solution of tasks that require ST.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信