哲学家、历史学家和受苦的陌生人

Jeffrey Flynn
{"title":"哲学家、历史学家和受苦的陌生人","authors":"Jeffrey Flynn","doi":"10.13154/MTS.57.2017.137-158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article juxtaposes two classic essays written in the 1970s, one by philosopher Peter Singer and one by historian Thomas Haskell, in order to identify a shared theme that animates their work: that the availability of repertoires for action to alleviate distant suffering affects our causal relation to the suffering, which in turn affects our responsibility to act. In this way, we see the historical context in which a certain kind of humanitarian appeal played a prominent role in the work of two ground-breaking scholars in different disciplines. The essay also identifies the limits of that kind of appeal by distinguishing what I will call Suffering Stranger Humanitarianism from Causal Contribution Humanitarianism. It concludes by showing how the latter involves notions of collective responsibility and how both modes of appeal can make use of the notion of complicity.","PeriodicalId":218833,"journal":{"name":"Moving the Social","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Philosophers, Historians, and Suffering Strangers\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Flynn\",\"doi\":\"10.13154/MTS.57.2017.137-158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article juxtaposes two classic essays written in the 1970s, one by philosopher Peter Singer and one by historian Thomas Haskell, in order to identify a shared theme that animates their work: that the availability of repertoires for action to alleviate distant suffering affects our causal relation to the suffering, which in turn affects our responsibility to act. In this way, we see the historical context in which a certain kind of humanitarian appeal played a prominent role in the work of two ground-breaking scholars in different disciplines. The essay also identifies the limits of that kind of appeal by distinguishing what I will call Suffering Stranger Humanitarianism from Causal Contribution Humanitarianism. It concludes by showing how the latter involves notions of collective responsibility and how both modes of appeal can make use of the notion of complicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":218833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Moving the Social\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Moving the Social\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13154/MTS.57.2017.137-158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving the Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13154/MTS.57.2017.137-158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文将哲学家彼得·辛格(Peter Singer)和历史学家托马斯·哈斯凯尔(Thomas Haskell)在20世纪70年代撰写的两篇经典文章并列,以确定一个共同的主题,使他们的作品充满活力:缓解遥远痛苦的行动曲目的可用性影响了我们与痛苦的因果关系,这反过来又影响了我们采取行动的责任。通过这种方式,我们看到了某种人道主义诉求在两位不同学科的开创性学者的工作中发挥突出作用的历史背景。这篇文章也通过区分受难陌生人人道主义和因果贡献人道主义来识别这种呼吁的局限性。最后,它展示了后者如何涉及集体责任的概念,以及这两种申诉方式如何利用共犯的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Philosophers, Historians, and Suffering Strangers
This article juxtaposes two classic essays written in the 1970s, one by philosopher Peter Singer and one by historian Thomas Haskell, in order to identify a shared theme that animates their work: that the availability of repertoires for action to alleviate distant suffering affects our causal relation to the suffering, which in turn affects our responsibility to act. In this way, we see the historical context in which a certain kind of humanitarian appeal played a prominent role in the work of two ground-breaking scholars in different disciplines. The essay also identifies the limits of that kind of appeal by distinguishing what I will call Suffering Stranger Humanitarianism from Causal Contribution Humanitarianism. It concludes by showing how the latter involves notions of collective responsibility and how both modes of appeal can make use of the notion of complicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信