删除了基于集合的抽象论证框架修订

Farid Nouioua, Éric Würbel
{"title":"删除了基于集合的抽象论证框架修订","authors":"Farid Nouioua, Éric Würbel","doi":"10.1109/ICTAI.2014.121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argumentation frameworks have aroused intense interest from the AI community over the past years. Dynamic aspects of argumentation frameworks have received some interest from the community, but none of these works tries to address the recovering problem, that is, what shall we do when the new addition leads to the loss of all extensions. Such problem is typically a belief revision problem. In this paper, we propose a revision operator to revise an argumentation framework by another one, with the guarantee that the result of the operation will be an argumentation framework which has at least one stable extension. We also propose an algorithm to compute the revision operation outcome.","PeriodicalId":142794,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removed Set-Based Revision of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks\",\"authors\":\"Farid Nouioua, Éric Würbel\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICTAI.2014.121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Argumentation frameworks have aroused intense interest from the AI community over the past years. Dynamic aspects of argumentation frameworks have received some interest from the community, but none of these works tries to address the recovering problem, that is, what shall we do when the new addition leads to the loss of all extensions. Such problem is typically a belief revision problem. In this paper, we propose a revision operator to revise an argumentation framework by another one, with the guarantee that the result of the operation will be an argumentation framework which has at least one stable extension. We also propose an algorithm to compute the revision operation outcome.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2014.121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 26th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2014.121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在过去的几年里,论证框架引起了人工智能社区的强烈兴趣。论证框架的动态方面已经引起了社区的一些兴趣,但是这些工作都没有试图解决恢复问题,也就是说,当新的添加导致所有扩展的损失时,我们该怎么办。这类问题是典型的信念修正问题。在本文中,我们提出了一个修正算子来用另一个论证框架来修正一个论证框架,并保证该操作的结果将是一个至少有一个稳定可拓的论证框架。我们还提出了一种计算修正操作结果的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Removed Set-Based Revision of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Argumentation frameworks have aroused intense interest from the AI community over the past years. Dynamic aspects of argumentation frameworks have received some interest from the community, but none of these works tries to address the recovering problem, that is, what shall we do when the new addition leads to the loss of all extensions. Such problem is typically a belief revision problem. In this paper, we propose a revision operator to revise an argumentation framework by another one, with the guarantee that the result of the operation will be an argumentation framework which has at least one stable extension. We also propose an algorithm to compute the revision operation outcome.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信