需求侧管理与热电联产的不平衡解决方案设计

S. Kermer
{"title":"需求侧管理与热电联产的不平衡解决方案设计","authors":"S. Kermer","doi":"10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper the effect of the imbalance settlement design is studied. The 3 considered imbalance settlement systems are single, dual and hybrid pricing systems. To evaluate the effects of system design, a statistical arbitrage model for two flexible asset holders - an aggregator with demand side flexibility and a combined heat and power plant is applied. System parameters such as absolute imbalance reduction, system costs and profits are analysed in the result section. This paper contributes to the discussion of imbalance settlement design in balancing markets and provides a numerical analysis of market players reacting to single, dual and the hybrid imbalance system design. The results suggest that the hybrid imbalance settlement system with a threshold of 10-15% of total control power reserves lead to best results in the Austrian market.","PeriodicalId":424038,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imbalance Settlement Design with Demand Side Management and Combined Heat and Power\",\"authors\":\"S. Kermer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper the effect of the imbalance settlement design is studied. The 3 considered imbalance settlement systems are single, dual and hybrid pricing systems. To evaluate the effects of system design, a statistical arbitrage model for two flexible asset holders - an aggregator with demand side flexibility and a combined heat and power plant is applied. System parameters such as absolute imbalance reduction, system costs and profits are analysed in the result section. This paper contributes to the discussion of imbalance settlement design in balancing markets and provides a numerical analysis of market players reacting to single, dual and the hybrid imbalance system design. The results suggest that the hybrid imbalance settlement system with a threshold of 10-15% of total control power reserves lead to best results in the Austrian market.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEC.2019.8662185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对不平衡沉降设计的影响进行了研究。考虑的3种不平衡解决系统是单一,双重和混合定价系统。为了评估系统设计的效果,应用了具有需求侧灵活性的集成商和热电联产电厂这两个灵活资产持有者的统计套利模型。结果部分分析了绝对不平衡减少、系统成本和利润等系统参数。本文对平衡市场中的不平衡解决设计进行了讨论,并对市场参与者对单一、双重和混合不平衡系统设计的反应进行了数值分析。结果表明,以总控制电量储备的10-15%为阈值的混合型不平衡结算制度在奥地利市场效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imbalance Settlement Design with Demand Side Management and Combined Heat and Power
In this paper the effect of the imbalance settlement design is studied. The 3 considered imbalance settlement systems are single, dual and hybrid pricing systems. To evaluate the effects of system design, a statistical arbitrage model for two flexible asset holders - an aggregator with demand side flexibility and a combined heat and power plant is applied. System parameters such as absolute imbalance reduction, system costs and profits are analysed in the result section. This paper contributes to the discussion of imbalance settlement design in balancing markets and provides a numerical analysis of market players reacting to single, dual and the hybrid imbalance system design. The results suggest that the hybrid imbalance settlement system with a threshold of 10-15% of total control power reserves lead to best results in the Austrian market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信