{"title":"马拉维的贸易自由化、制度和经济增长","authors":"Hopkins Henry Kawaye","doi":"10.54646/bijfmr.2023.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study provides an empirical assessment of how institutions and trade liberalization affect Malawi’s economicexpansion. It tackles the absence of empirical research into how institutions affect economic growth and howtrade liberalization policy affects institutions’ influence on growth (interaction effect). The study also seeks tofind out if economic growth, however, affects institutions as theories differ on causality. The study uses a timeseries analysis and autoregressive distribution lag (ARDL) technique to obtain short-run and long-run results. Thestudy was conducted from 1988, the official inception year of trade liberalization in Malawi, to 2014. The empiricalresults show that political and economic institutions, as well as trade liberalization, affect Malawi’s economicgrowth in both the short term and the long term. Trade liberalization and political institutions negatively affecteconomic growth in the short run and long run, whereas economic institutions positively affect economic growthin the short run and long run. The findings also show that when strong economic institutions rather than strongpolitical institutions are present, the effect of trade liberalization on economic development is more prominent(positive). Finally, the study also finds that it is institutions that affect economic growth in Malawi and not the otherway around.","PeriodicalId":432118,"journal":{"name":"BOHR International Journal of Finance and Market Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade liberalization, institutions, and economic growthin Malawi\",\"authors\":\"Hopkins Henry Kawaye\",\"doi\":\"10.54646/bijfmr.2023.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study provides an empirical assessment of how institutions and trade liberalization affect Malawi’s economicexpansion. It tackles the absence of empirical research into how institutions affect economic growth and howtrade liberalization policy affects institutions’ influence on growth (interaction effect). The study also seeks tofind out if economic growth, however, affects institutions as theories differ on causality. The study uses a timeseries analysis and autoregressive distribution lag (ARDL) technique to obtain short-run and long-run results. Thestudy was conducted from 1988, the official inception year of trade liberalization in Malawi, to 2014. The empiricalresults show that political and economic institutions, as well as trade liberalization, affect Malawi’s economicgrowth in both the short term and the long term. Trade liberalization and political institutions negatively affecteconomic growth in the short run and long run, whereas economic institutions positively affect economic growthin the short run and long run. The findings also show that when strong economic institutions rather than strongpolitical institutions are present, the effect of trade liberalization on economic development is more prominent(positive). Finally, the study also finds that it is institutions that affect economic growth in Malawi and not the otherway around.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BOHR International Journal of Finance and Market Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BOHR International Journal of Finance and Market Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijfmr.2023.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BOHR International Journal of Finance and Market Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54646/bijfmr.2023.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trade liberalization, institutions, and economic growthin Malawi
The study provides an empirical assessment of how institutions and trade liberalization affect Malawi’s economicexpansion. It tackles the absence of empirical research into how institutions affect economic growth and howtrade liberalization policy affects institutions’ influence on growth (interaction effect). The study also seeks tofind out if economic growth, however, affects institutions as theories differ on causality. The study uses a timeseries analysis and autoregressive distribution lag (ARDL) technique to obtain short-run and long-run results. Thestudy was conducted from 1988, the official inception year of trade liberalization in Malawi, to 2014. The empiricalresults show that political and economic institutions, as well as trade liberalization, affect Malawi’s economicgrowth in both the short term and the long term. Trade liberalization and political institutions negatively affecteconomic growth in the short run and long run, whereas economic institutions positively affect economic growthin the short run and long run. The findings also show that when strong economic institutions rather than strongpolitical institutions are present, the effect of trade liberalization on economic development is more prominent(positive). Finally, the study also finds that it is institutions that affect economic growth in Malawi and not the otherway around.