谁应该制作克朗?——回顾丹麦国家银行对CBDC的分析

Ole Bjerg, R. Nielsen
{"title":"谁应该制作克朗?——回顾丹麦国家银行对CBDC的分析","authors":"Ole Bjerg, R. Nielsen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3124816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is a review of Danmarks Nationalbank's recent analysis of the prospects of implementing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in Denmark. We concur with Nationalbanken's conclusion that CBDC does not add efficiency or further functionality to existing payment solutions. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to take into account the potentials for increased financial stability given the fact that CBDC carries no credit risk. We also find that Nationalbanken's dismissal of CBDC on the grounds that it does not provide new monetary policy tools, since interest rates are bound by the fixed exchange rate regime, fails to consider the value of CBDC in the event of a future crisis. Finally, we argue that the Nationalbanken's views may reflect a primary concern with the preservation of the existing banking sector in its current form over and above the needs of the general public.","PeriodicalId":344099,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Should Make Kroner? - A Review of Danmarks Nationalbank's Analysis of CBDC\",\"authors\":\"Ole Bjerg, R. Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3124816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is a review of Danmarks Nationalbank's recent analysis of the prospects of implementing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in Denmark. We concur with Nationalbanken's conclusion that CBDC does not add efficiency or further functionality to existing payment solutions. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to take into account the potentials for increased financial stability given the fact that CBDC carries no credit risk. We also find that Nationalbanken's dismissal of CBDC on the grounds that it does not provide new monetary policy tools, since interest rates are bound by the fixed exchange rate regime, fails to consider the value of CBDC in the event of a future crisis. Finally, we argue that the Nationalbanken's views may reflect a primary concern with the preservation of the existing banking sector in its current form over and above the needs of the general public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Banking & Monetary Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3124816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文回顾了丹麦国家银行最近对在丹麦实施中央银行数字货币(CBDC)前景的分析。我们同意Nationalbanken的结论,即CBDC不会为现有的支付解决方案增加效率或进一步的功能。然而,我们认为,鉴于CBDC不存在信用风险,他们的分析未能考虑到增加金融稳定性的潜力。我们还发现,由于利率受到固定汇率制度的约束,国家银行以CBDC不能提供新的货币政策工具为由,拒绝了CBDC,这没有考虑到CBDC在未来危机中的价值。最后,我们认为,国家银行的观点可能反映了一种主要的关注,即保存现有的银行部门,而不是普通公众的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who Should Make Kroner? - A Review of Danmarks Nationalbank's Analysis of CBDC
This paper is a review of Danmarks Nationalbank's recent analysis of the prospects of implementing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in Denmark. We concur with Nationalbanken's conclusion that CBDC does not add efficiency or further functionality to existing payment solutions. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to take into account the potentials for increased financial stability given the fact that CBDC carries no credit risk. We also find that Nationalbanken's dismissal of CBDC on the grounds that it does not provide new monetary policy tools, since interest rates are bound by the fixed exchange rate regime, fails to consider the value of CBDC in the event of a future crisis. Finally, we argue that the Nationalbanken's views may reflect a primary concern with the preservation of the existing banking sector in its current form over and above the needs of the general public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信