“在我看来,我知道真理,但我没有语言来表达它”:论证,它的特点和潜力

I. Antonova
{"title":"“在我看来,我知道真理,但我没有语言来表达它”:论证,它的特点和潜力","authors":"I. Antonova","doi":"10.28995/2073-6398-2022-3-54-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of argumentation caused by the ambiguity and multi-functionality of the phenomenon itself is ranked to be an infinite one. In ancient times argumentation used to be rightly considered a component of cognition and a method to prove the truth. Its functions today have extended considerably – from systematizing the knowledge to influencing rhetorically human views and behavior. It fulfills even more ambitious targets affecting the essence of ethical standards and thus the social and political background of the society. Teaching argumentation is a constituent of the modern educational system in Russia. In accordance with the requirements registered in the State Educational Standard for higher professional training of the Russian Federation (2010), experts in the humanitarian non-linguistic fields must demonstrate the ability to critical thinking which, in its turn, presupposes thinking and speaking logically in both – native and foreign – languages, holding, formulating logically one’s thoughts in the native and foreign languages, holding argumentative discussions, accepting or counter arguing a debatable issue. The author considers the phenomenon of argumentation applying the activity approach and thus analyzing its aims, correlating argumentation and proof concepts, and estimating teacher (argumentator) – student (recipient) relationships. In addition to this, the paper is aimed at considering the factors of transforming educational process from an informative to an argumentative (persuasive) one in which argumentation might be regarded as a method of impact","PeriodicalId":253464,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“IT SEEMS TO ME I KNOW THE TRUTH BUT I HAVE NO WORDS TO EXPRESS IT”: ARGUMENTATION, ITS PECULIARITIES AND POTENTIALS\",\"authors\":\"I. Antonova\",\"doi\":\"10.28995/2073-6398-2022-3-54-65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of argumentation caused by the ambiguity and multi-functionality of the phenomenon itself is ranked to be an infinite one. In ancient times argumentation used to be rightly considered a component of cognition and a method to prove the truth. Its functions today have extended considerably – from systematizing the knowledge to influencing rhetorically human views and behavior. It fulfills even more ambitious targets affecting the essence of ethical standards and thus the social and political background of the society. Teaching argumentation is a constituent of the modern educational system in Russia. In accordance with the requirements registered in the State Educational Standard for higher professional training of the Russian Federation (2010), experts in the humanitarian non-linguistic fields must demonstrate the ability to critical thinking which, in its turn, presupposes thinking and speaking logically in both – native and foreign – languages, holding, formulating logically one’s thoughts in the native and foreign languages, holding argumentative discussions, accepting or counter arguing a debatable issue. The author considers the phenomenon of argumentation applying the activity approach and thus analyzing its aims, correlating argumentation and proof concepts, and estimating teacher (argumentator) – student (recipient) relationships. In addition to this, the paper is aimed at considering the factors of transforming educational process from an informative to an argumentative (persuasive) one in which argumentation might be regarded as a method of impact\",\"PeriodicalId\":253464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-3-54-65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2022-3-54-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这种现象本身的模糊性和多功能性所引起的论证问题被列为一个无限的问题。在古代,论证被认为是认识的一个组成部分,是证明真理的一种方法。今天,它的功能已经有了相当大的扩展——从系统化的知识到影响人类的修辞观点和行为。它实现了更加雄心勃勃的目标,影响了道德标准的本质,从而影响了社会的社会和政治背景。教学论辩是俄罗斯现代教育制度的重要组成部分。根据俄罗斯联邦高等职业培训国家教育标准(2010年)的要求,人道主义非语言领域的专家必须具备批判性思维的能力,而批判性思维的先决条件是用母语和外语进行逻辑思维和说话,用母语和外语逻辑地表达自己的想法,进行辩论讨论。接受或反驳一个有争议的问题。作者运用活动方法考察论证现象,分析论证目的,关联论证与证明概念,评估教师(论证者)与学生(接受者)的关系。除此之外,本文还旨在考虑将教育过程从信息性转变为论证性(有说服力)的因素,其中论证可能被视为一种影响方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“IT SEEMS TO ME I KNOW THE TRUTH BUT I HAVE NO WORDS TO EXPRESS IT”: ARGUMENTATION, ITS PECULIARITIES AND POTENTIALS
The problem of argumentation caused by the ambiguity and multi-functionality of the phenomenon itself is ranked to be an infinite one. In ancient times argumentation used to be rightly considered a component of cognition and a method to prove the truth. Its functions today have extended considerably – from systematizing the knowledge to influencing rhetorically human views and behavior. It fulfills even more ambitious targets affecting the essence of ethical standards and thus the social and political background of the society. Teaching argumentation is a constituent of the modern educational system in Russia. In accordance with the requirements registered in the State Educational Standard for higher professional training of the Russian Federation (2010), experts in the humanitarian non-linguistic fields must demonstrate the ability to critical thinking which, in its turn, presupposes thinking and speaking logically in both – native and foreign – languages, holding, formulating logically one’s thoughts in the native and foreign languages, holding argumentative discussions, accepting or counter arguing a debatable issue. The author considers the phenomenon of argumentation applying the activity approach and thus analyzing its aims, correlating argumentation and proof concepts, and estimating teacher (argumentator) – student (recipient) relationships. In addition to this, the paper is aimed at considering the factors of transforming educational process from an informative to an argumentative (persuasive) one in which argumentation might be regarded as a method of impact
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信