拣货到零件仓库中基于关系的存储分配策略的行程估计

Hsu-Tung Lee Hsu-Tung Lee
{"title":"拣货到零件仓库中基于关系的存储分配策略的行程估计","authors":"Hsu-Tung Lee Hsu-Tung Lee","doi":"10.53106/102596272022030471002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Relation-Based Storage Assignment (RBSA), also called the “family grouping method,” has garnered significant interest among researchers and practitioners looking for an intuitive means by which to arrange related Stock Keeping Units (SKUs) in nearby regions for simultaneous picking. However, there is no analytic model for picking distance estimation for RBSA. Most of the related studies have targeted specific cases and applied simulation or mathematical programming to validate the family grouping method’s superiority over traditional storage assignment methods including the random assignment policy. To explore the effects of RBSA, this current study develops a preliminary analytical model of travel distance estimation for low- level, picker-to-part, and pick-by-order warehouses. We use Frequency-Based Storage Assignment (FBSA) as a baseline for comparison. We consider both single-aisle warehouse layouts and two-block, multi-aisle warehouse layouts, with return and traversal picking policies. The skewed ABC distribution curve of SKUs, the number of picks (N) per picking tour, the number of SKUs (n1) in a family, and the number of families (n2) are also taken into account. Our results show that, in comparison with the FBSA method, the RBSA method decreases the picking distance by as much as 32%.\n \n","PeriodicalId":170892,"journal":{"name":"企業管理學報","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Travel distance estimation of relation-based storage assignment policies in picker-to-part warehouses\",\"authors\":\"Hsu-Tung Lee Hsu-Tung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/102596272022030471002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Relation-Based Storage Assignment (RBSA), also called the “family grouping method,” has garnered significant interest among researchers and practitioners looking for an intuitive means by which to arrange related Stock Keeping Units (SKUs) in nearby regions for simultaneous picking. However, there is no analytic model for picking distance estimation for RBSA. Most of the related studies have targeted specific cases and applied simulation or mathematical programming to validate the family grouping method’s superiority over traditional storage assignment methods including the random assignment policy. To explore the effects of RBSA, this current study develops a preliminary analytical model of travel distance estimation for low- level, picker-to-part, and pick-by-order warehouses. We use Frequency-Based Storage Assignment (FBSA) as a baseline for comparison. We consider both single-aisle warehouse layouts and two-block, multi-aisle warehouse layouts, with return and traversal picking policies. The skewed ABC distribution curve of SKUs, the number of picks (N) per picking tour, the number of SKUs (n1) in a family, and the number of families (n2) are also taken into account. Our results show that, in comparison with the FBSA method, the RBSA method decreases the picking distance by as much as 32%.\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":170892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"企業管理學報\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"企業管理學報\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/102596272022030471002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"企業管理學報","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/102596272022030471002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于关系的存储分配(RBSA),也被称为“家庭分组方法”,已经引起了研究人员和实践者的极大兴趣,他们正在寻找一种直观的方法,通过这种方法在附近地区安排相关的库存单位(sku),以便同时挑选。然而,对于RBSA的选取距离估计,目前还没有解析模型。大多数相关研究都是针对具体案例,通过仿真或数学规划来验证族分组方法相对于传统的随机分配策略等存储分配方法的优越性。为了探讨RBSA的影响,本研究建立了一个初步的分析模型,用于低层仓库、拣货到零件仓库和按订单仓库的运输距离估计。我们使用基于频率的存储分配(FBSA)作为比较的基线。我们考虑单通道仓库布局和两块,多通道仓库布局,返回和遍历拣选策略。还考虑了sku的倾斜ABC分布曲线、每次采摘次数(N)、一个家庭的sku数量(n1)和家庭数量(n2)。结果表明,与FBSA方法相比,RBSA方法可将采摘距离缩短32%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Travel distance estimation of relation-based storage assignment policies in picker-to-part warehouses
Relation-Based Storage Assignment (RBSA), also called the “family grouping method,” has garnered significant interest among researchers and practitioners looking for an intuitive means by which to arrange related Stock Keeping Units (SKUs) in nearby regions for simultaneous picking. However, there is no analytic model for picking distance estimation for RBSA. Most of the related studies have targeted specific cases and applied simulation or mathematical programming to validate the family grouping method’s superiority over traditional storage assignment methods including the random assignment policy. To explore the effects of RBSA, this current study develops a preliminary analytical model of travel distance estimation for low- level, picker-to-part, and pick-by-order warehouses. We use Frequency-Based Storage Assignment (FBSA) as a baseline for comparison. We consider both single-aisle warehouse layouts and two-block, multi-aisle warehouse layouts, with return and traversal picking policies. The skewed ABC distribution curve of SKUs, the number of picks (N) per picking tour, the number of SKUs (n1) in a family, and the number of families (n2) are also taken into account. Our results show that, in comparison with the FBSA method, the RBSA method decreases the picking distance by as much as 32%.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信