相变材料在轻量化框架建筑中的应用

E. Zavrl, Gašper Zupanc, U. Stritih, M. Dovjak
{"title":"相变材料在轻量化框架建筑中的应用","authors":"E. Zavrl, Gašper Zupanc, U. Stritih, M. Dovjak","doi":"10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The trend of lightweight framed building structures is gaining in popularity. Due to lower accumulation capability and thermal stability, buildings might be inclined to higher risk of overheating. The purpose of this study is to investigate overheating in lightweight framed buildings from the aspect of thermal comfort and energy efficiency in cooling season. Single-family house was modelled using DesignBuilder™ and located in moderate climate (Ljubljana, Slovenia). Heavyweight structure was compared to lightweight structure coupled with all 14 variations of phase change materials (PCM). Different strategies of PCM encapsulation (microencapsulated plasterboards, macroencapsulated additional layer), melting points (23°C, 24°C, 25°C, 26°C, 27°C), capacities (M182, M91 M51, M27) and thicknesses (125 mm, 250 mm) of PCM were investigated and compared. The best passive solution was primarily evaluated based on the thermal comfort characteristics: average zone operative temperature (To) bends in cooling season. Secondarily, the additional energy needed for cooling within each solution was compared to the maximum allowed annual energy consumed for cooling specified in legislation. Consequently, the most influential parameter was the melting point of the PCM structure. Based on the chosen criteria, the overheating was significantly reduced using macroencapsulated layer with melting point of 24°C and minimum capacity of M51 (max. To 26.3°C). Heavyweight structure enabled lower To (27.1°C) in the building compared to microencapsulated plasterboard solution with melting point at 23°C and thickness of 250 mm (28.8°C). Correctly designed passive solution can be used for the improvement of the design strategy and legislation towards overheating prevention.","PeriodicalId":135907,"journal":{"name":"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overheating Reduction in Lightweight Framed Buildings\\nwith Application of Phase Change Materials\",\"authors\":\"E. Zavrl, Gašper Zupanc, U. Stritih, M. Dovjak\",\"doi\":\"10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The trend of lightweight framed building structures is gaining in popularity. Due to lower accumulation capability and thermal stability, buildings might be inclined to higher risk of overheating. The purpose of this study is to investigate overheating in lightweight framed buildings from the aspect of thermal comfort and energy efficiency in cooling season. Single-family house was modelled using DesignBuilder™ and located in moderate climate (Ljubljana, Slovenia). Heavyweight structure was compared to lightweight structure coupled with all 14 variations of phase change materials (PCM). Different strategies of PCM encapsulation (microencapsulated plasterboards, macroencapsulated additional layer), melting points (23°C, 24°C, 25°C, 26°C, 27°C), capacities (M182, M91 M51, M27) and thicknesses (125 mm, 250 mm) of PCM were investigated and compared. The best passive solution was primarily evaluated based on the thermal comfort characteristics: average zone operative temperature (To) bends in cooling season. Secondarily, the additional energy needed for cooling within each solution was compared to the maximum allowed annual energy consumed for cooling specified in legislation. Consequently, the most influential parameter was the melting point of the PCM structure. Based on the chosen criteria, the overheating was significantly reduced using macroencapsulated layer with melting point of 24°C and minimum capacity of M51 (max. To 26.3°C). Heavyweight structure enabled lower To (27.1°C) in the building compared to microencapsulated plasterboard solution with melting point at 23°C and thickness of 250 mm (28.8°C). Correctly designed passive solution can be used for the improvement of the design strategy and legislation towards overheating prevention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":135907,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

轻型框架建筑结构的趋势越来越受欢迎。由于积累能力和热稳定性较低,建筑物可能倾向于较高的过热风险。本研究的目的是从冷季热舒适和能源效率的角度研究轻型框架建筑的过热问题。单户住宅位于斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那,使用DesignBuilder™进行建模。将轻量级结构与14种相变材料(PCM)相结合进行了比较。研究了不同的PCM封装策略(微封装石膏板、大封装附加层)、熔点(23°C、24°C、25°C、26°C、27°C)、容量(M182、M91、M51、M27)和厚度(125 mm、250 mm)。最佳被动解决方案主要根据热舒适特性进行评价:冷却季节区域平均工作温度(To)弯曲。其次,将每个解决方案所需的额外能源与立法规定的最大允许年度冷却能源消耗量进行比较。因此,影响最大的参数是PCM结构的熔点。根据所选标准,采用熔点为24°C、最小容量为M51(最大容量为5mm)的大封装层可显著降低过热。到26.3°C)。与熔点为23°C、厚度为250 mm(28.8°C)的微胶囊石膏板溶液相比,重型结构使建筑物的温度降低至27.1°C。正确设计的无源解决方案可用于改进设计策略和防止过热立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overheating Reduction in Lightweight Framed Buildings with Application of Phase Change Materials
The trend of lightweight framed building structures is gaining in popularity. Due to lower accumulation capability and thermal stability, buildings might be inclined to higher risk of overheating. The purpose of this study is to investigate overheating in lightweight framed buildings from the aspect of thermal comfort and energy efficiency in cooling season. Single-family house was modelled using DesignBuilder™ and located in moderate climate (Ljubljana, Slovenia). Heavyweight structure was compared to lightweight structure coupled with all 14 variations of phase change materials (PCM). Different strategies of PCM encapsulation (microencapsulated plasterboards, macroencapsulated additional layer), melting points (23°C, 24°C, 25°C, 26°C, 27°C), capacities (M182, M91 M51, M27) and thicknesses (125 mm, 250 mm) of PCM were investigated and compared. The best passive solution was primarily evaluated based on the thermal comfort characteristics: average zone operative temperature (To) bends in cooling season. Secondarily, the additional energy needed for cooling within each solution was compared to the maximum allowed annual energy consumed for cooling specified in legislation. Consequently, the most influential parameter was the melting point of the PCM structure. Based on the chosen criteria, the overheating was significantly reduced using macroencapsulated layer with melting point of 24°C and minimum capacity of M51 (max. To 26.3°C). Heavyweight structure enabled lower To (27.1°C) in the building compared to microencapsulated plasterboard solution with melting point at 23°C and thickness of 250 mm (28.8°C). Correctly designed passive solution can be used for the improvement of the design strategy and legislation towards overheating prevention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信