深度卷积神经网络与人类物体识别领域的新目标尺度差异

Astrid Zeman, C. V. Meel, H. O. D. Beeck
{"title":"深度卷积神经网络与人类物体识别领域的新目标尺度差异","authors":"Astrid Zeman, C. V. Meel, H. O. D. Beeck","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1075-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are lauded for their high accuracy in object classification, as well as their striking similarity to human brain and behaviour. Both humans and CNNs maintain high classification accuracy despite changes in the scale, rotation, and translation of objects. In this study, we present images of novel objects at different scales and compare representational similarity in the human brain versus CNNs. We measure human fMRI responses in primary visual cortex (V1) and the object selective lateral occipital complex (LOC). We also measure the internal representations of CNNs that have been trained for largescale object recognition. Novel objects lack consensus on their name and identity, and therefore do not clearly belong to any specific object category. These novel objects are individuated in LOC, but not V1. V1 and LOC both significantly represent size and pixel information. In contrast, the late layers of CNNs show they are able to individuate objects but do not retain size information. Thus, while the human brain and CNNs are both able to recognise objects in spite of changes to their size, only the human brain retains this size information throughout the later stages of information processing.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel Object Scale Differences in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks versus Human Object Recognition Areas\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Zeman, C. V. Meel, H. O. D. Beeck\",\"doi\":\"10.32470/ccn.2019.1075-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are lauded for their high accuracy in object classification, as well as their striking similarity to human brain and behaviour. Both humans and CNNs maintain high classification accuracy despite changes in the scale, rotation, and translation of objects. In this study, we present images of novel objects at different scales and compare representational similarity in the human brain versus CNNs. We measure human fMRI responses in primary visual cortex (V1) and the object selective lateral occipital complex (LOC). We also measure the internal representations of CNNs that have been trained for largescale object recognition. Novel objects lack consensus on their name and identity, and therefore do not clearly belong to any specific object category. These novel objects are individuated in LOC, but not V1. V1 and LOC both significantly represent size and pixel information. In contrast, the late layers of CNNs show they are able to individuate objects but do not retain size information. Thus, while the human brain and CNNs are both able to recognise objects in spite of changes to their size, only the human brain retains this size information throughout the later stages of information processing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1075-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1075-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深度卷积神经网络(cnn)因其在对象分类方面的高准确性以及与人类大脑和行为的惊人相似性而受到称赞。尽管物体的尺度、旋转和平移发生了变化,但人类和cnn都保持了很高的分类精度。在这项研究中,我们呈现了不同尺度的新物体图像,并比较了人类大脑与cnn的表征相似性。我们测量了人类初级视觉皮层(V1)和客体选择性枕侧复合体(LOC)的fMRI反应。我们还测量了经过大规模目标识别训练的cnn的内部表示。新奇的物体在其名称和身份上缺乏共识,因此不清楚地属于任何特定的物体类别。这些新奇的对象在LOC中是个性化的,而不是V1。V1和LOC都能很好地表示尺寸和像素信息。相比之下,cnn的后期层显示它们能够个性化对象,但不能保留大小信息。因此,虽然人类大脑和cnn都能够在物体大小变化的情况下识别物体,但只有人类大脑在信息处理的后期阶段保留了这个大小信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel Object Scale Differences in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks versus Human Object Recognition Areas
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are lauded for their high accuracy in object classification, as well as their striking similarity to human brain and behaviour. Both humans and CNNs maintain high classification accuracy despite changes in the scale, rotation, and translation of objects. In this study, we present images of novel objects at different scales and compare representational similarity in the human brain versus CNNs. We measure human fMRI responses in primary visual cortex (V1) and the object selective lateral occipital complex (LOC). We also measure the internal representations of CNNs that have been trained for largescale object recognition. Novel objects lack consensus on their name and identity, and therefore do not clearly belong to any specific object category. These novel objects are individuated in LOC, but not V1. V1 and LOC both significantly represent size and pixel information. In contrast, the late layers of CNNs show they are able to individuate objects but do not retain size information. Thus, while the human brain and CNNs are both able to recognise objects in spite of changes to their size, only the human brain retains this size information throughout the later stages of information processing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信