伊斯兰保险公司与传统保险公司的效率比较

Alok Singh, Zaki N. Zahran
{"title":"伊斯兰保险公司与传统保险公司的效率比较","authors":"Alok Singh, Zaki N. Zahran","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2306013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This analysis compares the cost efficiency of Islamic and conventional insurers operating in eight countries. We analyze data collected from 32 insurers using stochastic frontier analysis, data envelope analysis and a partial frontier approach with order-alpha free disposal hull. We compare the efficiency of Islamic and conventional insurers and conclude that Islamic insurers are no more or less efficient than conventional insurers in carrying out insurance activities. Any differences arise in the investment side of the business, where Shariah restrictions render Islamic insurers less efficient than their conventional counterparts.","PeriodicalId":227461,"journal":{"name":"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of the Efficiency of Islamic and Conventional Insurers\",\"authors\":\"Alok Singh, Zaki N. Zahran\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2306013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This analysis compares the cost efficiency of Islamic and conventional insurers operating in eight countries. We analyze data collected from 32 insurers using stochastic frontier analysis, data envelope analysis and a partial frontier approach with order-alpha free disposal hull. We compare the efficiency of Islamic and conventional insurers and conclude that Islamic insurers are no more or less efficient than conventional insurers in carrying out insurance activities. Any differences arise in the investment side of the business, where Shariah restrictions render Islamic insurers less efficient than their conventional counterparts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2306013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Willis Towers Watson Technical Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2306013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本分析比较了在八个国家经营的伊斯兰保险公司和传统保险公司的成本效率。我们使用随机前沿分析、数据包络分析和部分前沿方法对32家保险公司收集的数据进行了分析。我们比较了伊斯兰保险公司和传统保险公司的效率,并得出结论,伊斯兰保险公司在开展保险活动方面并不比传统保险公司效率更高或更低。任何差异都出现在该业务的投资方面,伊斯兰教法的限制使得伊斯兰保险公司的效率低于传统保险公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of the Efficiency of Islamic and Conventional Insurers
This analysis compares the cost efficiency of Islamic and conventional insurers operating in eight countries. We analyze data collected from 32 insurers using stochastic frontier analysis, data envelope analysis and a partial frontier approach with order-alpha free disposal hull. We compare the efficiency of Islamic and conventional insurers and conclude that Islamic insurers are no more or less efficient than conventional insurers in carrying out insurance activities. Any differences arise in the investment side of the business, where Shariah restrictions render Islamic insurers less efficient than their conventional counterparts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信