{"title":"创新生态系统中的项目评估","authors":"Luiza Stein da Silva, Micheline Gaia Hoffmann","doi":"10.12712/RPCA.V14I3.43111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to analyze how different typologies and evaluation approaches relate to assessment requirements of a program inserted in an innovation ecosystem. Methodology involved interviews with 21 stakeholders and a documentary survey. Although the nature of the program suggests greater alignment with developmental evaluation and a subjectivist approach, the results also imply assessment demands based on the objectivist approach. Conclusions highlight the relevance of stakeholders’ demand for defining evaluation guidelines, and indicate that programs inserted in collaborative networks receive a diversity of demands that require multiple typologies and approaches.","PeriodicalId":344601,"journal":{"name":"Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Program assessment in innovation ecosystems\",\"authors\":\"Luiza Stein da Silva, Micheline Gaia Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.12712/RPCA.V14I3.43111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to analyze how different typologies and evaluation approaches relate to assessment requirements of a program inserted in an innovation ecosystem. Methodology involved interviews with 21 stakeholders and a documentary survey. Although the nature of the program suggests greater alignment with developmental evaluation and a subjectivist approach, the results also imply assessment demands based on the objectivist approach. Conclusions highlight the relevance of stakeholders’ demand for defining evaluation guidelines, and indicate that programs inserted in collaborative networks receive a diversity of demands that require multiple typologies and approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12712/RPCA.V14I3.43111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12712/RPCA.V14I3.43111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The objective of this study is to analyze how different typologies and evaluation approaches relate to assessment requirements of a program inserted in an innovation ecosystem. Methodology involved interviews with 21 stakeholders and a documentary survey. Although the nature of the program suggests greater alignment with developmental evaluation and a subjectivist approach, the results also imply assessment demands based on the objectivist approach. Conclusions highlight the relevance of stakeholders’ demand for defining evaluation guidelines, and indicate that programs inserted in collaborative networks receive a diversity of demands that require multiple typologies and approaches.