M. Zand, V. Basili, I. Baxter, M. Griss, Even-André Karlsson, D. Perry
{"title":"重用研发:理论与实践的差距","authors":"M. Zand, V. Basili, I. Baxter, M. Griss, Even-André Karlsson, D. Perry","doi":"10.1145/303008.303081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have made tremendous progress in understanding the critical technology, methods, processes, and organizational factors that lead to effective reuse. Research into new methods and technologies continues unabated. However, far too few software organizations and schools consider systematic reuse as a key part of their programs. Recent developments such as CBSE and 00 patterns do not incorporate key learning from the reuse community. Why does reuse technology transfer seems to be so slow and ineffective? How might we improve the situation?","PeriodicalId":270366,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reuse R&D: gap between theory and practice\",\"authors\":\"M. Zand, V. Basili, I. Baxter, M. Griss, Even-André Karlsson, D. Perry\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/303008.303081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We have made tremendous progress in understanding the critical technology, methods, processes, and organizational factors that lead to effective reuse. Research into new methods and technologies continues unabated. However, far too few software organizations and schools consider systematic reuse as a key part of their programs. Recent developments such as CBSE and 00 patterns do not incorporate key learning from the reuse community. Why does reuse technology transfer seems to be so slow and ineffective? How might we improve the situation?\",\"PeriodicalId\":270366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/303008.303081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Software Reusability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/303008.303081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We have made tremendous progress in understanding the critical technology, methods, processes, and organizational factors that lead to effective reuse. Research into new methods and technologies continues unabated. However, far too few software organizations and schools consider systematic reuse as a key part of their programs. Recent developments such as CBSE and 00 patterns do not incorporate key learning from the reuse community. Why does reuse technology transfer seems to be so slow and ineffective? How might we improve the situation?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
