为保护消费者融资企业提供法律保障的诚信原则(印尼共和国最高法院裁决编号1041 K/Pdt. su - b胡克/2017)

Arfi Azhari, Siti Nurbaiti
{"title":"为保护消费者融资企业提供法律保障的诚信原则(印尼共和国最高法院裁决编号1041 K/Pdt. su - b胡克/2017)","authors":"Arfi Azhari, Siti Nurbaiti","doi":"10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consumer Finance is a financing activity for the procurement of goods based on consumer needs with payment in installments. In consumer financing, the parties must have good intentions for the smooth running of the agreement, but in practice the principle of good faith is often violated by the parties such as in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 decides to grant a request from Martha Sitorus (consumer) with consideration of Article 2 of the UUPK and the principle of good faith, which in this case with the existence of the decision clearly has harmed PT. Toyota Astra Financial Service Medan (business actor) for consumer financing agreements. The problem studied is how the legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing and how the RI Decision No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 towards legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing. The research method used is a normative method supported by interview data. The results of the writing illustrate that the business actor does not receive legal protection as stipulated in Article 6 letter (b) UUPK and in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 The Panel of Judges is not right in making decisions.","PeriodicalId":206816,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asas Itikad Baik Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Usaha Dalam Pembiayaan Konsumen (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1041 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017)\",\"authors\":\"Arfi Azhari, Siti Nurbaiti\",\"doi\":\"10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Consumer Finance is a financing activity for the procurement of goods based on consumer needs with payment in installments. In consumer financing, the parties must have good intentions for the smooth running of the agreement, but in practice the principle of good faith is often violated by the parties such as in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 decides to grant a request from Martha Sitorus (consumer) with consideration of Article 2 of the UUPK and the principle of good faith, which in this case with the existence of the decision clearly has harmed PT. Toyota Astra Financial Service Medan (business actor) for consumer financing agreements. The problem studied is how the legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing and how the RI Decision No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 towards legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing. The research method used is a normative method supported by interview data. The results of the writing illustrate that the business actor does not receive legal protection as stipulated in Article 6 letter (b) UUPK and in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 The Panel of Judges is not right in making decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Hukum Adigama\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Hukum Adigama\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Adigama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

消费金融是一种以分期付款的方式根据消费者的需求购买商品的融资活动。在消费融资中,为了协议的顺利进行,当事人必须有良好的意图,但在实践中,如印度尼西亚共和国最高法院第1041 / K-Pdt号判决中,当事人经常违反诚信原则。考虑到UUPK第2条和诚信原则,su - bpsk /2017决定批准Martha Sitorus(消费者)的请求,在这种情况下,该决定的存在显然损害了PT. Toyota Astra Financial Service Medan(商业行为者)的消费者融资协议。所研究的问题是消费者如何在消费者融资中对商业行为者提供法律保护,以及国际商会第1041 / K-Pdt号决定如何。su - bpsk /2017关于消费者在消费金融中对商业行为者的法律保护。研究方法采用访谈数据支持的规范方法。写作的结果表明,商业行为者没有得到《联合王国》第6条第(b)款和印度尼西亚共和国最高法院第1041 / K-Pdt号决定所规定的法律保护。su - bpsk /2017评委团做出的决定不正确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asas Itikad Baik Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pelaku Usaha Dalam Pembiayaan Konsumen (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1041 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017)
Consumer Finance is a financing activity for the procurement of goods based on consumer needs with payment in installments. In consumer financing, the parties must have good intentions for the smooth running of the agreement, but in practice the principle of good faith is often violated by the parties such as in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 decides to grant a request from Martha Sitorus (consumer) with consideration of Article 2 of the UUPK and the principle of good faith, which in this case with the existence of the decision clearly has harmed PT. Toyota Astra Financial Service Medan (business actor) for consumer financing agreements. The problem studied is how the legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing and how the RI Decision No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 towards legal protection of business actors carried out by consumers in consumer financing. The research method used is a normative method supported by interview data. The results of the writing illustrate that the business actor does not receive legal protection as stipulated in Article 6 letter (b) UUPK and in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1041 / K-Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2017 The Panel of Judges is not right in making decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信