Pooria Namyar, Behnaz Arzani, Ryan Beckett, Santiago Segarra, Himanshu Raj, Srikanth Kandula
{"title":"注意快速启发式和最优启发式之间的差距","authors":"Pooria Namyar, Behnaz Arzani, Ryan Beckett, Santiago Segarra, Himanshu Raj, Srikanth Kandula","doi":"10.1145/3563766.3564102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Production systems use heuristics because they are faster or scale better than the corresponding optimal algorithms. Yet, practitioners are often unaware of how worse off a heuristic's solution may be with respect to the optimum in realistic scenarios. Leveraging two-stage games and convex optimization, we present a provable framework that unveils settings where a given heuristic underperforms.","PeriodicalId":339381,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minding the gap between fast heuristics and their optimal counterparts\",\"authors\":\"Pooria Namyar, Behnaz Arzani, Ryan Beckett, Santiago Segarra, Himanshu Raj, Srikanth Kandula\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3563766.3564102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Production systems use heuristics because they are faster or scale better than the corresponding optimal algorithms. Yet, practitioners are often unaware of how worse off a heuristic's solution may be with respect to the optimum in realistic scenarios. Leveraging two-stage games and convex optimization, we present a provable framework that unveils settings where a given heuristic underperforms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 21st ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 21st ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3563766.3564102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3563766.3564102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Minding the gap between fast heuristics and their optimal counterparts
Production systems use heuristics because they are faster or scale better than the corresponding optimal algorithms. Yet, practitioners are often unaware of how worse off a heuristic's solution may be with respect to the optimum in realistic scenarios. Leveraging two-stage games and convex optimization, we present a provable framework that unveils settings where a given heuristic underperforms.