内核双样本测试vs.大脑解码

E. Olivetti, Danilo Benozzo, S. M. Kia, Marta Ellero, T. Hartmann
{"title":"内核双样本测试vs.大脑解码","authors":"E. Olivetti, Danilo Benozzo, S. M. Kia, Marta Ellero, T. Hartmann","doi":"10.1109/PRNI.2013.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing whether the patterns of brain activity systematically differ when the subject is presented with different sets of stimuli is called \"brain decoding\". The most common solution to this problem is based on testing whether a classifier can accurately predict the type of stimulus from brain data. In this work we present a novel approach to the brain decoding problem which does not require any classifier. The proposed method is based on a high-dimensional two-sample test recently proposed in the machine learning literature. The test tries to determine whether the set of brain recordings related to one kind of stimulus, i.e. the first sample, and the ones related to the other kind of stimulus, i.e. the second sample, are drawn from the same probability distribution or not. In this work we illustrate the advantages of this novel approach together with experimental evidence of its efficacy on magneto encephalographic (MEG) data from a Face, House and Body discrimination task.","PeriodicalId":144007,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Kernel Two-Sample Test vs. Brain Decoding\",\"authors\":\"E. Olivetti, Danilo Benozzo, S. M. Kia, Marta Ellero, T. Hartmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PRNI.2013.41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Assessing whether the patterns of brain activity systematically differ when the subject is presented with different sets of stimuli is called \\\"brain decoding\\\". The most common solution to this problem is based on testing whether a classifier can accurately predict the type of stimulus from brain data. In this work we present a novel approach to the brain decoding problem which does not require any classifier. The proposed method is based on a high-dimensional two-sample test recently proposed in the machine learning literature. The test tries to determine whether the set of brain recordings related to one kind of stimulus, i.e. the first sample, and the ones related to the other kind of stimulus, i.e. the second sample, are drawn from the same probability distribution or not. In this work we illustrate the advantages of this novel approach together with experimental evidence of its efficacy on magneto encephalographic (MEG) data from a Face, House and Body discrimination task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2013.41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in Neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRNI.2013.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当受试者面对不同的刺激时,评估其大脑活动模式是否系统性地不同被称为“大脑解码”。这个问题最常见的解决方案是测试分类器是否能准确地从大脑数据中预测刺激的类型。在这项工作中,我们提出了一种不需要任何分类器的大脑解码问题的新方法。提出的方法是基于最近在机器学习文献中提出的高维双样本测试。该测试试图确定与一种刺激(即第一个样本)相关的一组大脑记录,以及与另一种刺激(即第二个样本)相关的一组大脑记录是否来自相同的概率分布。在这项工作中,我们说明了这种新方法的优点,并结合实验证据证明了它对面部、房屋和身体识别任务的脑磁图(MEG)数据的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Kernel Two-Sample Test vs. Brain Decoding
Assessing whether the patterns of brain activity systematically differ when the subject is presented with different sets of stimuli is called "brain decoding". The most common solution to this problem is based on testing whether a classifier can accurately predict the type of stimulus from brain data. In this work we present a novel approach to the brain decoding problem which does not require any classifier. The proposed method is based on a high-dimensional two-sample test recently proposed in the machine learning literature. The test tries to determine whether the set of brain recordings related to one kind of stimulus, i.e. the first sample, and the ones related to the other kind of stimulus, i.e. the second sample, are drawn from the same probability distribution or not. In this work we illustrate the advantages of this novel approach together with experimental evidence of its efficacy on magneto encephalographic (MEG) data from a Face, House and Body discrimination task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信