{"title":"多核RISC-V SOC验证的后硅测试生成的可扩展性","authors":"Sih Pin Tan, Yung It Ho","doi":"10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Instruction Stream Generators (ISG) are an important tool in post-silicon validation of modern CPU s, including RISC- V CPU designs. ISG test generation needs to accurately model the target instruction set and is a compute-intensive process typically performed on off-platform generator machines. With the rising CPU core count and ISA complexity on modern SOC designs, ISG requires a corresponding increase in compute capacity with every generation. The trendline shows that simply throwing more compute at the problem is untenable from a cost perspective. This paper studies several alternative approaches to address this scalability problem. First, it is shown that test generation throughput increases in a nonlinear fashion to an increase in target core count and test length. A correlation curve can be plotted by characterizing test generation throughput against target configurations to identify a sweet spot for test footprint. The study then explores how selective replacement of randomized instruction sequences with fixed routines can improve test generation performance, with careful consideration needed to mitigate any potential loss of validation quality. It then discusses how such test optimizations can even be strategized to improve validation coverage.","PeriodicalId":150801,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scalability of Post-Silicon Test Generation for Multi-core RISC-V SOC Validation\",\"authors\":\"Sih Pin Tan, Yung It Ho\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Instruction Stream Generators (ISG) are an important tool in post-silicon validation of modern CPU s, including RISC- V CPU designs. ISG test generation needs to accurately model the target instruction set and is a compute-intensive process typically performed on off-platform generator machines. With the rising CPU core count and ISA complexity on modern SOC designs, ISG requires a corresponding increase in compute capacity with every generation. The trendline shows that simply throwing more compute at the problem is untenable from a cost perspective. This paper studies several alternative approaches to address this scalability problem. First, it is shown that test generation throughput increases in a nonlinear fashion to an increase in target core count and test length. A correlation curve can be plotted by characterizing test generation throughput against target configurations to identify a sweet spot for test footprint. The study then explores how selective replacement of randomized instruction sequences with fixed routines can improve test generation performance, with careful consideration needed to mitigate any potential loss of validation quality. It then discusses how such test optimizations can even be strategized to improve validation coverage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Embedded Multicore/Many-core Systems-on-Chip (MCSoC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSoC57363.2022.00012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
指令流生成器(ISG)是现代CPU(包括RISC- V CPU设计)后硅验证的重要工具。ISG测试生成需要准确地对目标指令集建模,这是一个计算密集型的过程,通常在非平台生成器机器上执行。随着现代SOC设计中CPU核数和ISA复杂性的增加,ISG需要每一代相应的计算能力增加。趋势线表明,从成本的角度来看,简单地投入更多的计算来解决问题是站不住脚的。本文研究了几种解决可伸缩性问题的替代方法。首先,测试生成吞吐量以非线性方式随着目标核心数和测试长度的增加而增加。可以通过根据目标配置描述测试生成吞吐量来绘制相关曲线,以确定测试足迹的最佳点。然后,该研究探讨了如何选择性地用固定例程替换随机指令序列可以提高测试生成性能,并需要仔细考虑以减轻验证质量的任何潜在损失。然后讨论了如何制定这样的测试优化策略来提高验证覆盖率。
Scalability of Post-Silicon Test Generation for Multi-core RISC-V SOC Validation
Instruction Stream Generators (ISG) are an important tool in post-silicon validation of modern CPU s, including RISC- V CPU designs. ISG test generation needs to accurately model the target instruction set and is a compute-intensive process typically performed on off-platform generator machines. With the rising CPU core count and ISA complexity on modern SOC designs, ISG requires a corresponding increase in compute capacity with every generation. The trendline shows that simply throwing more compute at the problem is untenable from a cost perspective. This paper studies several alternative approaches to address this scalability problem. First, it is shown that test generation throughput increases in a nonlinear fashion to an increase in target core count and test length. A correlation curve can be plotted by characterizing test generation throughput against target configurations to identify a sweet spot for test footprint. The study then explores how selective replacement of randomized instruction sequences with fixed routines can improve test generation performance, with careful consideration needed to mitigate any potential loss of validation quality. It then discusses how such test optimizations can even be strategized to improve validation coverage.