荟萃分析中治疗-协变量相互作用的评估,剔除缺失的个体患者数据

Y. Yamaguchi, Wataru Sakamoto, S. Shirahata, M. Goto
{"title":"荟萃分析中治疗-协变量相互作用的评估,剔除缺失的个体患者数据","authors":"Y. Yamaguchi, Wataru Sakamoto, S. Shirahata, M. Goto","doi":"10.5183/JJSCS.1212001_203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meta-analysis methods based on individual patient data (IPD) have attracted attention in estimating a treatment-covariate interaction effect. An existing metaregression approach, based on aggregate data (AD) such as a treatment effect estimate and its standard error, is used only for the inference of between-trial interaction which indicates a relationship between the treatment effect estimates and mean covariate values; in contrast, the use of IPD can achieve estimation of not only the between-trial interaction but also within-trial interaction which indicates a relationship between individual outcomes and individual covariate values. However, most of the IPD metaanalyses are often difficult to implement because practitioners cannot always collect the IPD from all trials involved. We propose a new meta-analysis method for estimating both the between-trial and the within-trial interaction, in which we assume an IPD meta-analysis model for the missing IPD and then marginalize its density with respect to the missing IPD. The proposed method allows one to estimate the withintrial interaction even when only AD are available, and has potential benefits for another meta-analytic situation where some trials provide IPD and the others provide only AD. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate how close estimates of the between-trial and the within-trial interaction from the proposed method are to those from the IPD meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":338719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Japanese Society of Computational Statistics","volume":"9 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AN EVALUATION OF TREATMENT-COVARIATE INTERACTION IN META-ANALYSIS WITH MARGINALIZING OF MISSING INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA\",\"authors\":\"Y. Yamaguchi, Wataru Sakamoto, S. Shirahata, M. Goto\",\"doi\":\"10.5183/JJSCS.1212001_203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Meta-analysis methods based on individual patient data (IPD) have attracted attention in estimating a treatment-covariate interaction effect. An existing metaregression approach, based on aggregate data (AD) such as a treatment effect estimate and its standard error, is used only for the inference of between-trial interaction which indicates a relationship between the treatment effect estimates and mean covariate values; in contrast, the use of IPD can achieve estimation of not only the between-trial interaction but also within-trial interaction which indicates a relationship between individual outcomes and individual covariate values. However, most of the IPD metaanalyses are often difficult to implement because practitioners cannot always collect the IPD from all trials involved. We propose a new meta-analysis method for estimating both the between-trial and the within-trial interaction, in which we assume an IPD meta-analysis model for the missing IPD and then marginalize its density with respect to the missing IPD. The proposed method allows one to estimate the withintrial interaction even when only AD are available, and has potential benefits for another meta-analytic situation where some trials provide IPD and the others provide only AD. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate how close estimates of the between-trial and the within-trial interaction from the proposed method are to those from the IPD meta-analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":338719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Japanese Society of Computational Statistics\",\"volume\":\"9 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Japanese Society of Computational Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5183/JJSCS.1212001_203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Japanese Society of Computational Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5183/JJSCS.1212001_203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于个体患者数据(IPD)的荟萃分析方法在估计治疗-协变量相互作用效应方面引起了人们的关注。现有的元回归方法基于综合数据(AD),如治疗效果估计及其标准误差,仅用于试验间相互作用的推断,这表明治疗效果估计与协变量平均值之间存在关系;相比之下,使用IPD不仅可以估计试验间相互作用,还可以估计试验内相互作用,这表明个体结果与个体协变量值之间存在关系。然而,大多数IPD荟萃分析往往难以实施,因为从业者不能总是从所有相关试验中收集IPD。我们提出了一种新的元分析方法来估计试验之间和试验内部的相互作用,其中我们假设缺失IPD的IPD元分析模型,然后将其密度相对于缺失IPD边缘化。所提出的方法允许人们估计试验内相互作用,即使只有AD可用,并且对另一种荟萃分析情况有潜在的好处,其中一些试验提供IPD,而其他试验只提供AD。通过模拟研究,我们证明了所提出的方法对试验间和试验内相互作用的估计与IPD荟萃分析的估计是多么接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AN EVALUATION OF TREATMENT-COVARIATE INTERACTION IN META-ANALYSIS WITH MARGINALIZING OF MISSING INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA
Meta-analysis methods based on individual patient data (IPD) have attracted attention in estimating a treatment-covariate interaction effect. An existing metaregression approach, based on aggregate data (AD) such as a treatment effect estimate and its standard error, is used only for the inference of between-trial interaction which indicates a relationship between the treatment effect estimates and mean covariate values; in contrast, the use of IPD can achieve estimation of not only the between-trial interaction but also within-trial interaction which indicates a relationship between individual outcomes and individual covariate values. However, most of the IPD metaanalyses are often difficult to implement because practitioners cannot always collect the IPD from all trials involved. We propose a new meta-analysis method for estimating both the between-trial and the within-trial interaction, in which we assume an IPD meta-analysis model for the missing IPD and then marginalize its density with respect to the missing IPD. The proposed method allows one to estimate the withintrial interaction even when only AD are available, and has potential benefits for another meta-analytic situation where some trials provide IPD and the others provide only AD. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate how close estimates of the between-trial and the within-trial interaction from the proposed method are to those from the IPD meta-analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信