{"title":"论连续交易的影响","authors":"Ivan Indriawan, R. Pascual, Andriy Shkilko","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3707154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The continuous limit order book, in which messages are processed one by one in the order of receipt, is a prominent design feature of modern securities markets. Theoretical models show that this design imposes a cost on liquidity providers and suggest that this cost may be reduced by switching to batch auctions. We examine a recent opposite move, whereby a stock exchange switches from batch auctions to continuous trading. The move leads to a significant increase in adverse selection, which is partly offset by a reduction in inventory costs. The net liquidity effect of the switch is negative.","PeriodicalId":430354,"journal":{"name":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Effects of Continuous Trading\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Indriawan, R. Pascual, Andriy Shkilko\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3707154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The continuous limit order book, in which messages are processed one by one in the order of receipt, is a prominent design feature of modern securities markets. Theoretical models show that this design imposes a cost on liquidity providers and suggest that this cost may be reduced by switching to batch auctions. We examine a recent opposite move, whereby a stock exchange switches from batch auctions to continuous trading. The move leads to a significant increase in adverse selection, which is partly offset by a reduction in inventory costs. The net liquidity effect of the switch is negative.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IO: Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3707154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The continuous limit order book, in which messages are processed one by one in the order of receipt, is a prominent design feature of modern securities markets. Theoretical models show that this design imposes a cost on liquidity providers and suggest that this cost may be reduced by switching to batch auctions. We examine a recent opposite move, whereby a stock exchange switches from batch auctions to continuous trading. The move leads to a significant increase in adverse selection, which is partly offset by a reduction in inventory costs. The net liquidity effect of the switch is negative.