人工神经网络分类训练算法性能比较

F. D. Baptista, Sandy Rodrigues, F. Morgado‐Dias
{"title":"人工神经网络分类训练算法性能比较","authors":"F. D. Baptista, Sandy Rodrigues, F. Morgado‐Dias","doi":"10.1109/WISP.2013.6657493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Artificial Neural Network research community has been actively working since the beginning of the 80s. Since then many existing algorithm were adapted, many new algorithms were created and many times the set of algorithms was revisited and reinvented. As a result an enormous set of algorithms exists and, even for the experienced user it is not easy to choose the best algorithm for a given task or dataset, even though many of the algorithms are available in implementations of existing tools. In this work we have chosen a set of algorithms which are tested with a few datasets and tested several times for different initial sets of weights and different numbers of hidden neurons while keeping one hidden layer for all the Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks.","PeriodicalId":350883,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of ANN training algorithms for classification\",\"authors\":\"F. D. Baptista, Sandy Rodrigues, F. Morgado‐Dias\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WISP.2013.6657493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Artificial Neural Network research community has been actively working since the beginning of the 80s. Since then many existing algorithm were adapted, many new algorithms were created and many times the set of algorithms was revisited and reinvented. As a result an enormous set of algorithms exists and, even for the experienced user it is not easy to choose the best algorithm for a given task or dataset, even though many of the algorithms are available in implementations of existing tools. In this work we have chosen a set of algorithms which are tested with a few datasets and tested several times for different initial sets of weights and different numbers of hidden neurons while keeping one hidden layer for all the Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WISP.2013.6657493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WISP.2013.6657493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

自80年代初以来,人工神经网络研究界一直在积极开展工作。从那时起,许多现有的算法被改编,许多新算法被创建,许多算法集被重新审视和重新发明。因此,存在大量的算法集,即使对于有经验的用户来说,为给定的任务或数据集选择最佳算法也不容易,即使许多算法在现有工具的实现中可用。在这项工作中,我们选择了一组算法,这些算法使用几个数据集进行测试,并针对不同的初始权重集和不同数量的隐藏神经元进行多次测试,同时为所有前馈人工神经网络保留一个隐藏层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance comparison of ANN training algorithms for classification
The Artificial Neural Network research community has been actively working since the beginning of the 80s. Since then many existing algorithm were adapted, many new algorithms were created and many times the set of algorithms was revisited and reinvented. As a result an enormous set of algorithms exists and, even for the experienced user it is not easy to choose the best algorithm for a given task or dataset, even though many of the algorithms are available in implementations of existing tools. In this work we have chosen a set of algorithms which are tested with a few datasets and tested several times for different initial sets of weights and different numbers of hidden neurons while keeping one hidden layer for all the Feedforward Artificial Neural Networks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信