“在民主社会值得尊重”?福斯特与有争议信仰的表达

Judicial Review Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949

James E. Hurford

{"title":"“在民主社会值得尊重”?福斯特与有争议信仰的表达","authors":"James E. Hurford","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. In one of history’s most notorious legal proceedings, the judge – an obscure Roman official in a backwater Imperial province – was moved to ask, ‘What is truth?’ One suspects a bureaucratic figure like Pontius Pilate never received an answer that would have satisfied him; however, the quest for truth – and humanity’s right and obligation to seek it – has occupied the species in subsequent centuries.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Worthy of Respect in a Democratic Society’? Forstater and the Expression of Controversial Beliefs\",\"authors\":\"James E. Hurford\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. In one of history’s most notorious legal proceedings, the judge – an obscure Roman official in a backwater Imperial province – was moved to ask, ‘What is truth?’ One suspects a bureaucratic figure like Pontius Pilate never received an answer that would have satisfied him; however, the quest for truth – and humanity’s right and obligation to seek it – has occupied the species in subsequent centuries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2021.2030949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 在历史上最臭名昭著的法律诉讼之一中，法官——一位来自帝国一个落后省份的无名罗马官员——感动地问道:“什么是真相?”有人怀疑，像本丢·彼拉多这样的官僚人物从来没有得到过令他满意的答案;然而，在随后的几个世纪里，对真理的追求——以及人类寻求真理的权利和义务——一直占据着这个物种。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

‘Worthy of Respect in a Democratic Society’? Forstater and the Expression of Controversial Beliefs

1. In one of history’s most notorious legal proceedings, the judge – an obscure Roman official in a backwater Imperial province – was moved to ask, ‘What is truth?’ One suspects a bureaucratic figure like Pontius Pilate never received an answer that would have satisfied him; however, the quest for truth – and humanity’s right and obligation to seek it – has occupied the species in subsequent centuries.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Judicial Review

自引率

0.00%

发文量