磁共振谱中共振定量的先进信号处理方法

Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000 Pub Date : 2000-06-23 DOI:10.1109/CBMS.2000.856877

Yu Wang, Sabine Van Huÿel, L. Vanhamme, N. Mastronardi, P. Hecke

{"title":"磁共振谱中共振定量的先进信号处理方法","authors":"Yu Wang, Sabine Van Huÿel, L. Vanhamme, N. Mastronardi, P. Hecke","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2000.856877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A careful comparison between principal component analysis (PCA) and Hankel total least squares (HTLS) based methods for estimating the resonances in sets of magnetic resonance (MR) spectra is presented. After a description of the methods, we compare their performance on simulated data sets and discuss their advantages and limitations.","PeriodicalId":189930,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced signal processing methods for quantitation of resonances in magnetic resonance spectra\",\"authors\":\"Yu Wang, Sabine Van Huÿel, L. Vanhamme, N. Mastronardi, P. Hecke\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CBMS.2000.856877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A careful comparison between principal component analysis (PCA) and Hankel total least squares (HTLS) based methods for estimating the resonances in sets of magnetic resonance (MR) spectra is presented. After a description of the methods, we compare their performance on simulated data sets and discuss their advantages and limitations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2000.856877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2000.856877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

对基于主成分分析(PCA)和基于Hankel总最小二乘(HTLS)的磁共振谱集共振估计方法进行了比较。在描述了这些方法之后，我们比较了它们在模拟数据集上的性能，并讨论了它们的优点和局限性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Advanced signal processing methods for quantitation of resonances in magnetic resonance spectra

A careful comparison between principal component analysis (PCA) and Hankel total least squares (HTLS) based methods for estimating the resonances in sets of magnetic resonance (MR) spectra is presented. After a description of the methods, we compare their performance on simulated data sets and discuss their advantages and limitations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings 13th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems. CBMS 2000

自引率

0.00%

发文量