地理学家计数:地理学定量方法研究报告

Richard Harris, T. Nicholas, C. Souch, A. Singleton, S. Orford, C. Keylock, C. Jarvis, C. Brunsdon
{"title":"地理学家计数:地理学定量方法研究报告","authors":"Richard Harris, T. Nicholas, C. Souch, A. Singleton, S. Orford, C. Keylock, C. Jarvis, C. Brunsdon","doi":"10.11120/elss.2014.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This report is drawn from a project funded to better support the teachers of quantitative methods in UK social science. In it we identify the types of quantitative methods taught in the geography curricula for UK schools and universities, and discuss attitudes towards those methods amongst students and teachers. We argue that geography has benefitted from its position at the intersection of the sciences, social sciences and humanities, retaining a quantitative component. Consequently, levels of basic numeracy and data handling have remained relatively high, leaving the discipline well placed to respond to the call for greater quantitative training within the social sciences in the UK. However, we also suspect that the typical levels of quantitative training in university human geography courses are not sufficiently high to compete on the international stage. As the title suggests, our report is focused on geography. However we raise issues germane to other disciplines including what actually we mean by quantitative methods, what should be taught in a twenty-first century curriculum, how to meaningfully embed those methods in the substantive themes and teaching of a discipline, and whether more should be expected as a minimum standard of quantitative competence than the existing Quality Assurance Agency benchmarks require.","PeriodicalId":147930,"journal":{"name":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographers Count: A Report on Quantitative Methods in Geography\",\"authors\":\"Richard Harris, T. Nicholas, C. Souch, A. Singleton, S. Orford, C. Keylock, C. Jarvis, C. Brunsdon\",\"doi\":\"10.11120/elss.2014.00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This report is drawn from a project funded to better support the teachers of quantitative methods in UK social science. In it we identify the types of quantitative methods taught in the geography curricula for UK schools and universities, and discuss attitudes towards those methods amongst students and teachers. We argue that geography has benefitted from its position at the intersection of the sciences, social sciences and humanities, retaining a quantitative component. Consequently, levels of basic numeracy and data handling have remained relatively high, leaving the discipline well placed to respond to the call for greater quantitative training within the social sciences in the UK. However, we also suspect that the typical levels of quantitative training in university human geography courses are not sufficiently high to compete on the international stage. As the title suggests, our report is focused on geography. However we raise issues germane to other disciplines including what actually we mean by quantitative methods, what should be taught in a twenty-first century curriculum, how to meaningfully embed those methods in the substantive themes and teaching of a discipline, and whether more should be expected as a minimum standard of quantitative competence than the existing Quality Assurance Agency benchmarks require.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147930,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2014.00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11120/elss.2014.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本报告来源于一个资助项目,该项目旨在更好地支持英国社会科学定量方法的教师。在这篇文章中,我们确定了英国学校和大学地理课程中教授的定量方法的类型,并讨论了学生和教师对这些方法的态度。我们认为,地理得益于其在科学、社会科学和人文科学交叉点的地位,保留了定量成分。因此,基本的计算能力和数据处理水平仍然相对较高,这使得该学科能够很好地响应英国社会科学领域对更多定量培训的呼吁。然而,我们也怀疑大学人文地理课程中典型的定量训练水平不足以在国际舞台上竞争。正如标题所示,我们的报告侧重于地理。然而,我们提出了与其他学科相关的问题,包括我们所说的定量方法的实际含义,在21世纪的课程中应该教授什么,如何有意义地将这些方法嵌入到学科的实质性主题和教学中,以及作为定量能力的最低标准是否应该比现有的质量保证机构基准要求更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Geographers Count: A Report on Quantitative Methods in Geography
Abstract This report is drawn from a project funded to better support the teachers of quantitative methods in UK social science. In it we identify the types of quantitative methods taught in the geography curricula for UK schools and universities, and discuss attitudes towards those methods amongst students and teachers. We argue that geography has benefitted from its position at the intersection of the sciences, social sciences and humanities, retaining a quantitative component. Consequently, levels of basic numeracy and data handling have remained relatively high, leaving the discipline well placed to respond to the call for greater quantitative training within the social sciences in the UK. However, we also suspect that the typical levels of quantitative training in university human geography courses are not sufficiently high to compete on the international stage. As the title suggests, our report is focused on geography. However we raise issues germane to other disciplines including what actually we mean by quantitative methods, what should be taught in a twenty-first century curriculum, how to meaningfully embed those methods in the substantive themes and teaching of a discipline, and whether more should be expected as a minimum standard of quantitative competence than the existing Quality Assurance Agency benchmarks require.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信