{"title":"货物销售合同的解除","authors":"P. Atiyah","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00517.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE case of Long v. Lloyd,1 noted by Mr. Grunfeld in 21 M.L.R. p. 550, is of such interest that a further Note on it may not be superfluous. It is unnecessary to set the facts out again in detail. Reduced to its simplest elements the case involved a sale of goods in which the seller had made certain statements regarding the quality of the goods to the buyer, and the latter was claiming the right to rescind the contract on the ground that these statements were false.","PeriodicalId":426546,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rescission of a Contract of Sale of Goods\",\"authors\":\"P. Atiyah\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00517.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE case of Long v. Lloyd,1 noted by Mr. Grunfeld in 21 M.L.R. p. 550, is of such interest that a further Note on it may not be superfluous. It is unnecessary to set the facts out again in detail. Reduced to its simplest elements the case involved a sale of goods in which the seller had made certain statements regarding the quality of the goods to the buyer, and the latter was claiming the right to rescind the contract on the ground that these statements were false.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00517.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Modern Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1959.tb00517.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
THE case of Long v. Lloyd,1 noted by Mr. Grunfeld in 21 M.L.R. p. 550, is of such interest that a further Note on it may not be superfluous. It is unnecessary to set the facts out again in detail. Reduced to its simplest elements the case involved a sale of goods in which the seller had made certain statements regarding the quality of the goods to the buyer, and the latter was claiming the right to rescind the contract on the ground that these statements were false.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
