正式指定时间约束和错误恢复

S. Kent, T. Maibaum, W. Quirk
{"title":"正式指定时间约束和错误恢复","authors":"S. Kent, T. Maibaum, W. Quirk","doi":"10.1109/ISRE.1993.324856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent research has advocated the use of deontic logics in requirements specification. A form of deontic action logic is described, and it is shown how it can be used to specify both temporal constraints and error recovery. The logic includes a deontic predicate of bounded obligation, and normative predicates. Bounded obligation allows bounds to be placed on the performance of actions, and can be used to specify temporal constraints. The formalism also allows the removal and extension of obligations before they must be met. The normative predicates indicate when a system has performed an action normally or abnormally, and allow the specification of corrective actions that recover from error situations.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":375368,"journal":{"name":"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formally specifying temporal constraints and error recovery\",\"authors\":\"S. Kent, T. Maibaum, W. Quirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISRE.1993.324856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent research has advocated the use of deontic logics in requirements specification. A form of deontic action logic is described, and it is shown how it can be used to specify both temporal constraints and error recovery. The logic includes a deontic predicate of bounded obligation, and normative predicates. Bounded obligation allows bounds to be placed on the performance of actions, and can be used to specify temporal constraints. The formalism also allows the removal and extension of obligations before they must be met. The normative predicates indicate when a system has performed an action normally or abnormally, and allow the specification of corrective actions that recover from error situations.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":375368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1993.324856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISRE.1993.324856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

最近的研究提倡在需求规范中使用道义逻辑。描述了道义行为逻辑的一种形式,并展示了如何使用它来指定时间约束和错误恢复。逻辑包括有界义务的道义谓词和规范谓词。有界义务允许对操作的执行设置界限,并可用于指定时间约束。形式主义还允许在必须履行义务之前取消和延长义务。规范谓词指示系统何时正常或异常地执行操作,并允许规范从错误情况中恢复的纠正操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formally specifying temporal constraints and error recovery
Recent research has advocated the use of deontic logics in requirements specification. A form of deontic action logic is described, and it is shown how it can be used to specify both temporal constraints and error recovery. The logic includes a deontic predicate of bounded obligation, and normative predicates. Bounded obligation allows bounds to be placed on the performance of actions, and can be used to specify temporal constraints. The formalism also allows the removal and extension of obligations before they must be met. The normative predicates indicate when a system has performed an action normally or abnormally, and allow the specification of corrective actions that recover from error situations.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信