{"title":"异氰尿酸三缩水甘油酯两种取样方法的现场比较","authors":"S. Thygerson, Joshua West, R. Merrill","doi":"10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Side-by-side field sampling comparisons for \nTriglycidylisocyanurate (TGIC) were conducted \nusing 1) a laboratory method to determine specific levels of airborne TGIC, and \n2) the NIOSH 0500 method for Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated for total \naerosol mass. Resulting concentrations from the NIOSH 0500 method in \nconjunction with the powder coating manufacturer safety data sheet are then \nused to estimate TGIC levels in air. This second method is designed as a \nsimpler and less expensive sampling and analytical method. Results show that \nthe NIOSH 0500 method resulted in airborne concentrations up to ten times \ngreater than the laboratory method resulting in specific for TGIC. Coefficients of variation show that the laboratory method had the least variability. We \nconclude that the NIOSH 0500 method and subsequent calculation should not be \nused to quantify TGIC levels in powder coatings. However, this method may be \nused to monitor effectiveness of exposure \ncontrol.","PeriodicalId":183634,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","volume":"2 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field Comparison of Two Sampling Methods for Triglycidyl Isocyanurate\",\"authors\":\"S. Thygerson, Joshua West, R. Merrill\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Side-by-side field sampling comparisons for \\nTriglycidylisocyanurate (TGIC) were conducted \\nusing 1) a laboratory method to determine specific levels of airborne TGIC, and \\n2) the NIOSH 0500 method for Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated for total \\naerosol mass. Resulting concentrations from the NIOSH 0500 method in \\nconjunction with the powder coating manufacturer safety data sheet are then \\nused to estimate TGIC levels in air. This second method is designed as a \\nsimpler and less expensive sampling and analytical method. Results show that \\nthe NIOSH 0500 method resulted in airborne concentrations up to ten times \\ngreater than the laboratory method resulting in specific for TGIC. Coefficients of variation show that the laboratory method had the least variability. We \\nconclude that the NIOSH 0500 method and subsequent calculation should not be \\nused to quantify TGIC levels in powder coatings. However, this method may be \\nused to monitor effectiveness of exposure \\ncontrol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Field Comparison of Two Sampling Methods for Triglycidyl Isocyanurate
Side-by-side field sampling comparisons for
Triglycidylisocyanurate (TGIC) were conducted
using 1) a laboratory method to determine specific levels of airborne TGIC, and
2) the NIOSH 0500 method for Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated for total
aerosol mass. Resulting concentrations from the NIOSH 0500 method in
conjunction with the powder coating manufacturer safety data sheet are then
used to estimate TGIC levels in air. This second method is designed as a
simpler and less expensive sampling and analytical method. Results show that
the NIOSH 0500 method resulted in airborne concentrations up to ten times
greater than the laboratory method resulting in specific for TGIC. Coefficients of variation show that the laboratory method had the least variability. We
conclude that the NIOSH 0500 method and subsequent calculation should not be
used to quantify TGIC levels in powder coatings. However, this method may be
used to monitor effectiveness of exposure
control.