异氰尿酸三缩水甘油酯两种取样方法的现场比较

S. Thygerson, Joshua West, R. Merrill
{"title":"异氰尿酸三缩水甘油酯两种取样方法的现场比较","authors":"S. Thygerson, Joshua West, R. Merrill","doi":"10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Side-by-side field sampling comparisons for \nTriglycidylisocyanurate (TGIC) were conducted \nusing 1) a laboratory method to determine specific levels of airborne TGIC, and \n2) the NIOSH 0500 method for Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated for total \naerosol mass. Resulting concentrations from the NIOSH 0500 method in \nconjunction with the powder coating manufacturer safety data sheet are then \nused to estimate TGIC levels in air. This second method is designed as a \nsimpler and less expensive sampling and analytical method. Results show that \nthe NIOSH 0500 method resulted in airborne concentrations up to ten times \ngreater than the laboratory method resulting in specific for TGIC. Coefficients of variation show that the laboratory method had the least variability. We \nconclude that the NIOSH 0500 method and subsequent calculation should not be \nused to quantify TGIC levels in powder coatings. However, this method may be \nused to monitor effectiveness of exposure \ncontrol.","PeriodicalId":183634,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","volume":"2 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field Comparison of Two Sampling Methods for Triglycidyl Isocyanurate\",\"authors\":\"S. Thygerson, Joshua West, R. Merrill\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Side-by-side field sampling comparisons for \\nTriglycidylisocyanurate (TGIC) were conducted \\nusing 1) a laboratory method to determine specific levels of airborne TGIC, and \\n2) the NIOSH 0500 method for Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated for total \\naerosol mass. Resulting concentrations from the NIOSH 0500 method in \\nconjunction with the powder coating manufacturer safety data sheet are then \\nused to estimate TGIC levels in air. This second method is designed as a \\nsimpler and less expensive sampling and analytical method. Results show that \\nthe NIOSH 0500 method resulted in airborne concentrations up to ten times \\ngreater than the laboratory method resulting in specific for TGIC. Coefficients of variation show that the laboratory method had the least variability. We \\nconclude that the NIOSH 0500 method and subsequent calculation should not be \\nused to quantify TGIC levels in powder coatings. However, this method may be \\nused to monitor effectiveness of exposure \\ncontrol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":183634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJSST.2013.34013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对三甘油三酯异氰尿酸酯(TGIC)进行了并排现场采样比较,采用1)实验室方法确定空气中TGIC的具体水平,以及2)NIOSH 0500方法测定未受其他管制的颗粒物的总气溶胶质量。从NIOSH 0500方法得到的浓度,结合粉末涂料制造商的安全数据表,然后用于估计空气中的TGIC水平。第二种方法被设计为一种更简单、更便宜的采样和分析方法。结果表明,NIOSH 0500方法导致空气中的浓度比实验室方法高10倍,导致对TGIC的特异性。变异系数表明,实验室方法的变异最小。我们得出结论,NIOSH 0500方法和随后的计算不应用于量化粉末涂料中的TGIC水平。然而,这种方法可用于监测暴露控制的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Field Comparison of Two Sampling Methods for Triglycidyl Isocyanurate
Side-by-side field sampling comparisons for Triglycidylisocyanurate (TGIC) were conducted using 1) a laboratory method to determine specific levels of airborne TGIC, and 2) the NIOSH 0500 method for Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated for total aerosol mass. Resulting concentrations from the NIOSH 0500 method in conjunction with the powder coating manufacturer safety data sheet are then used to estimate TGIC levels in air. This second method is designed as a simpler and less expensive sampling and analytical method. Results show that the NIOSH 0500 method resulted in airborne concentrations up to ten times greater than the laboratory method resulting in specific for TGIC. Coefficients of variation show that the laboratory method had the least variability. We conclude that the NIOSH 0500 method and subsequent calculation should not be used to quantify TGIC levels in powder coatings. However, this method may be used to monitor effectiveness of exposure control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信