M. Kovačević
{"title":"DRŽAVNA (NE)BRIGA ZA SRPSKI JEZIK","authors":"M. Kovačević","doi":"10.46793/zip21.069k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper analyzes the attitude of the Republic of Serbia, i.e. of its (ir)responsible institutions towards the Serbian language based on the status of the Serbian language defined in three laws and one strategy, as follows: 1) Law on the Use of Serbian Language in Public Life and Protection and Preservation of the Cyrillic Script, 2) Law on the Official Use of Languages and Scripts, 3) Law on Gender Equality, and 4) National Strategy for Gender Equality 2021–2030, with an action plan for its implementation for the period of 2021‒2023. Only the first of these laws is in favour of the Serbian language. But it has more symbolic than practical value, as it is still inferior in key provisions to the current Law on the Official Use of Languages and Scripts. The analysis showed that the three documents, two laws and one strategy, are inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. But the current government does not think so, and the Constitutional Court did not state its position regarding the incompatibility of the documents with the Constitution. Both the Law on the Official Use of Languages and Scripts and the Law on Gender Equality are in fact laws against the Serbian language, as their provisions directly deny and/or undermine the Serbian language, especially as a Serbian identity criterion. The degradation does affect only the Serbian language; negative consequences of the National Strategy for Gender Equality have an effect on the entire Serbian educational system ‒ from preschool to higher education – as well as scientific research work in the field of humanities and social sciences.","PeriodicalId":441367,"journal":{"name":"IDENTITETSKE promene: srpski jezik i književnost u doba tranzicije","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDENTITETSKE promene: srpski jezik i književnost u doba tranzicije","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/zip21.069k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文根据三项法律和一项战略所界定的塞尔维亚语的地位,分析了塞尔维亚共和国,即其(ir)负责机构对塞尔维亚语的态度如下:1)《在公共生活中使用塞尔维亚语和保护和保存西里尔文字法》,2)《官方语言和文字使用法》,3)《性别平等法》,4)《2021-2030年国家性别平等战略》及其2021-2023年实施行动计划。这些法律中只有第一条有利于塞尔维亚语。但是,它的象征意义大于实际价值,因为它在关键条款方面仍然不如现行的《官方语言文字使用法》。分析表明,两项法律和一项战略这三个文件与塞尔维亚共和国宪法不一致。但是现政府不这么认为,宪法裁判所也没有对文件是否与宪法不一致的问题表明立场。《正式使用语言和文字法》和《两性平等法》实际上都是反对塞尔维亚语的法律,因为它们的条款直接否认和(或)破坏塞尔维亚语,特别是作为塞尔维亚人身份标准的塞尔维亚语。这种退化只影响塞尔维亚语;《全国两性平等战略》的消极后果影响到整个塞尔维亚教育系统- -从学前教育到高等教育- -以及人文和社会科学领域的科学研究工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DRŽAVNA (NE)BRIGA ZA SRPSKI JEZIK
The paper analyzes the attitude of the Republic of Serbia, i.e. of its (ir)responsible institutions towards the Serbian language based on the status of the Serbian language defined in three laws and one strategy, as follows: 1) Law on the Use of Serbian Language in Public Life and Protection and Preservation of the Cyrillic Script, 2) Law on the Official Use of Languages and Scripts, 3) Law on Gender Equality, and 4) National Strategy for Gender Equality 2021–2030, with an action plan for its implementation for the period of 2021‒2023. Only the first of these laws is in favour of the Serbian language. But it has more symbolic than practical value, as it is still inferior in key provisions to the current Law on the Official Use of Languages and Scripts. The analysis showed that the three documents, two laws and one strategy, are inconsistent with the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia. But the current government does not think so, and the Constitutional Court did not state its position regarding the incompatibility of the documents with the Constitution. Both the Law on the Official Use of Languages and Scripts and the Law on Gender Equality are in fact laws against the Serbian language, as their provisions directly deny and/or undermine the Serbian language, especially as a Serbian identity criterion. The degradation does affect only the Serbian language; negative consequences of the National Strategy for Gender Equality have an effect on the entire Serbian educational system ‒ from preschool to higher education – as well as scientific research work in the field of humanities and social sciences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信