{"title":"B群链球菌携带者的快速鉴定。","authors":"F Scopetti, F Cecinato, G Orefici","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensitivity and specificity of three commercial latex agglutination tests, i.e. Streptex, Wellcogen (Wellcome Diagnostics, Dartford, England) and Directigen (Becton Dickinson, Baltimore, USA) were evaluated on 233 vaginal swabs and 208 urine specimens after 4h culture in comparison with traditional cultural and identification methods. On vaginal swabs sensitivity of Wellcogen and Streptex was shown to be comparable (43% and 37% respectively), but both tests gave several false positive results; Directigen test showed higher (100%) specificity, but its sensitivity was very low. On urine cultures all the tests were shown to be unsatisfactory in comparison with traditional methods, sensitivity and specificity being demonstrated to be poor.</p>","PeriodicalId":75613,"journal":{"name":"Bollettino dell'Istituto sieroterapico milanese","volume":"69 1","pages":"349-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid identification of group B streptococci carriers.\",\"authors\":\"F Scopetti, F Cecinato, G Orefici\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sensitivity and specificity of three commercial latex agglutination tests, i.e. Streptex, Wellcogen (Wellcome Diagnostics, Dartford, England) and Directigen (Becton Dickinson, Baltimore, USA) were evaluated on 233 vaginal swabs and 208 urine specimens after 4h culture in comparison with traditional cultural and identification methods. On vaginal swabs sensitivity of Wellcogen and Streptex was shown to be comparable (43% and 37% respectively), but both tests gave several false positive results; Directigen test showed higher (100%) specificity, but its sensitivity was very low. On urine cultures all the tests were shown to be unsatisfactory in comparison with traditional methods, sensitivity and specificity being demonstrated to be poor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bollettino dell'Istituto sieroterapico milanese\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"349-51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bollettino dell'Istituto sieroterapico milanese\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bollettino dell'Istituto sieroterapico milanese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
采用Streptex、Wellcogen (Wellcome Diagnostics, Dartford, England)和Directigen (Becton Dickinson, Baltimore, USA) 3种商用乳胶凝集试验对233份阴道拭子和208份尿液标本进行培养4h后的敏感性和特异性评价,并与传统培养和鉴定方法进行比较。在阴道拭子上,Wellcogen和Streptex的敏感性显示出可比性(分别为43%和37%),但两种测试都产生了一些假阳性结果;Directigen试验具有较高的特异性(100%),但敏感性很低。与传统方法相比,所有的尿液培养试验都不令人满意,敏感性和特异性都很差。
Rapid identification of group B streptococci carriers.
Sensitivity and specificity of three commercial latex agglutination tests, i.e. Streptex, Wellcogen (Wellcome Diagnostics, Dartford, England) and Directigen (Becton Dickinson, Baltimore, USA) were evaluated on 233 vaginal swabs and 208 urine specimens after 4h culture in comparison with traditional cultural and identification methods. On vaginal swabs sensitivity of Wellcogen and Streptex was shown to be comparable (43% and 37% respectively), but both tests gave several false positive results; Directigen test showed higher (100%) specificity, but its sensitivity was very low. On urine cultures all the tests were shown to be unsatisfactory in comparison with traditional methods, sensitivity and specificity being demonstrated to be poor.