{"title":"经济公平与重大发展","authors":"N. Stoeckl","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1zcm2r5.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It matters not whether one looks at labour income or non-labour income or at different measures of income/wealth concentration, inequality has been increasing within and across many countries throughout the last few decades (Jaumotte et al., 2013). Australia is no exception: indeed on some measures, this country is more ‘unequal’ than the majority of other OECD countries (specifically, the gap between the poorest and the richest 10% of households). Most notable, has been the recent rise in the share of total income that has gone to the richest 1% of Australians: in 1980 the richest 1% received just 5% of all income, but by 2008 the richest 1% were receiving almost 12% of income – the fourth highest of all OECD countries (Hoeller et al., 2012). Thus, despite Australia’s progressive tax system, and targeted cash transfers which seek to redistribute incomes, its above-average wage dispersion, and its large share of part-time/casual workers (Watson, 2013) means that household disposable incomes are unevenly distributed and are becoming even more unequal over time (Hoeller et al. 2012). Regional inequality has also risen sharply in recent times (Rodriguez-Pose, 2012).","PeriodicalId":265831,"journal":{"name":"Leading from the North","volume":"37 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Equity and Major Development\",\"authors\":\"N. Stoeckl\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1zcm2r5.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It matters not whether one looks at labour income or non-labour income or at different measures of income/wealth concentration, inequality has been increasing within and across many countries throughout the last few decades (Jaumotte et al., 2013). Australia is no exception: indeed on some measures, this country is more ‘unequal’ than the majority of other OECD countries (specifically, the gap between the poorest and the richest 10% of households). Most notable, has been the recent rise in the share of total income that has gone to the richest 1% of Australians: in 1980 the richest 1% received just 5% of all income, but by 2008 the richest 1% were receiving almost 12% of income – the fourth highest of all OECD countries (Hoeller et al., 2012). Thus, despite Australia’s progressive tax system, and targeted cash transfers which seek to redistribute incomes, its above-average wage dispersion, and its large share of part-time/casual workers (Watson, 2013) means that household disposable incomes are unevenly distributed and are becoming even more unequal over time (Hoeller et al. 2012). Regional inequality has also risen sharply in recent times (Rodriguez-Pose, 2012).\",\"PeriodicalId\":265831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leading from the North\",\"volume\":\"37 12\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leading from the North\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1zcm2r5.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leading from the North","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1zcm2r5.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
不管你是看劳动收入还是非劳动收入,还是看收入/财富集中的不同衡量标准,在过去的几十年里,不平等在许多国家内部和国家之间都在增加(Jaumotte等人,2013年)。澳大利亚也不例外:事实上,在某些方面,这个国家比大多数其他经合组织国家更“不平等”(特别是最贫穷和最富有的10%家庭之间的差距)。最值得注意的是,最近澳大利亚最富有的1%的人在总收入中所占的份额有所上升:1980年,最富有的1%的人只获得了总收入的5%,但到2008年,最富有的1%的人几乎获得了总收入的12%——在所有经合组织国家中排名第四(Hoeller et al., 2012)。因此,尽管澳大利亚实行累进税制,并有针对性的现金转移,试图重新分配收入,但其高于平均水平的工资分散,以及兼职/临时工的巨大份额(Watson, 2013)意味着家庭可支配收入分配不均匀,并且随着时间的推移变得更加不平等(Hoeller等人,2012)。近年来,地区不平等也急剧加剧(Rodriguez-Pose, 2012)。
It matters not whether one looks at labour income or non-labour income or at different measures of income/wealth concentration, inequality has been increasing within and across many countries throughout the last few decades (Jaumotte et al., 2013). Australia is no exception: indeed on some measures, this country is more ‘unequal’ than the majority of other OECD countries (specifically, the gap between the poorest and the richest 10% of households). Most notable, has been the recent rise in the share of total income that has gone to the richest 1% of Australians: in 1980 the richest 1% received just 5% of all income, but by 2008 the richest 1% were receiving almost 12% of income – the fourth highest of all OECD countries (Hoeller et al., 2012). Thus, despite Australia’s progressive tax system, and targeted cash transfers which seek to redistribute incomes, its above-average wage dispersion, and its large share of part-time/casual workers (Watson, 2013) means that household disposable incomes are unevenly distributed and are becoming even more unequal over time (Hoeller et al. 2012). Regional inequality has also risen sharply in recent times (Rodriguez-Pose, 2012).