维也纳冲浪:实地评估移动宽带质量

W-MUST '11 Pub Date : 2011-08-19 DOI:10.1145/2018602.2018608
R. Schatz, S. Egger
{"title":"维也纳冲浪:实地评估移动宽带质量","authors":"R. Schatz, S. Egger","doi":"10.1145/2018602.2018608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents our findings from a mobile broadband QoE field trial conducted in the city of Vienna, Austria. Using their own laptops in everyday contexts, participants regularly assessed the quality of their mobile broadband connection (tasks: web surfing, file downloads) which in the background was manipulated via traffic shaping throughout a period of three weeks. We discuss our study setup and observations of field trial participant behavior (rating patterns, times, contexts, etc.) as well as the results and lessons learned from correlating end user QoE ratings with measurements performed at client and network level. In addition, we compare our results with those from similar lab experiments, showing that the two evaluation contexts (lab, field) cannot be used interchangeably due to deviant QoE rating behavior of participants.","PeriodicalId":387856,"journal":{"name":"W-MUST '11","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vienna surfing: assessing mobile broadband quality in the field\",\"authors\":\"R. Schatz, S. Egger\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2018602.2018608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents our findings from a mobile broadband QoE field trial conducted in the city of Vienna, Austria. Using their own laptops in everyday contexts, participants regularly assessed the quality of their mobile broadband connection (tasks: web surfing, file downloads) which in the background was manipulated via traffic shaping throughout a period of three weeks. We discuss our study setup and observations of field trial participant behavior (rating patterns, times, contexts, etc.) as well as the results and lessons learned from correlating end user QoE ratings with measurements performed at client and network level. In addition, we compare our results with those from similar lab experiments, showing that the two evaluation contexts (lab, field) cannot be used interchangeably due to deviant QoE rating behavior of participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"W-MUST '11\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"W-MUST '11\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2018602.2018608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"W-MUST '11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2018602.2018608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

本文介绍了我们在奥地利维也纳市进行的移动宽带QoE现场试验的发现。参与者在日常环境中使用自己的笔记本电脑,定期评估他们移动宽带连接的质量(任务:上网,文件下载),在三周的时间里,这些质量在后台通过流量塑造来控制。我们讨论了我们的研究设置和现场试验参与者行为的观察(评级模式、时间、背景等),以及将最终用户QoE评级与客户端和网络层面执行的测量相关联的结果和经验教训。此外,我们将我们的结果与类似实验室实验的结果进行了比较,表明由于参与者的偏差QoE评级行为,两种评估情境(实验室,现场)不能互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vienna surfing: assessing mobile broadband quality in the field
This paper presents our findings from a mobile broadband QoE field trial conducted in the city of Vienna, Austria. Using their own laptops in everyday contexts, participants regularly assessed the quality of their mobile broadband connection (tasks: web surfing, file downloads) which in the background was manipulated via traffic shaping throughout a period of three weeks. We discuss our study setup and observations of field trial participant behavior (rating patterns, times, contexts, etc.) as well as the results and lessons learned from correlating end user QoE ratings with measurements performed at client and network level. In addition, we compare our results with those from similar lab experiments, showing that the two evaluation contexts (lab, field) cannot be used interchangeably due to deviant QoE rating behavior of participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信