第二手语评估评分

T. Haug, E. Boers-Visker, W. Mann, Geoffrey S. Poor, Beppie van den Bogaerde
{"title":"第二手语评估评分","authors":"T. Haug, E. Boers-Visker, W. Mann, Geoffrey S. Poor, Beppie van den Bogaerde","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There exists a scarcity in signed language assessment research, especially on scoring issues and interrater reliability. This chapter describes two related assessment instruments, the SLPI and the NFA, which offer scoring criteria. Raters are provided with scales for evaluating the different components of the language production of the candidate. Through its use, the rating system has been proved successful; there is, however, hardly any data on interrater reliability. In this chapter, the authors describe reliability issues with attention to raters’ training and score resolution techniques and discuss how to identify and increase rater reliability. The dearth of knowledge on signed language assessment, and in particular its validity and reliability, indicates an urgent need for more research in this area.","PeriodicalId":150857,"journal":{"name":"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scoring Second Signed Language Assessment\",\"authors\":\"T. Haug, E. Boers-Visker, W. Mann, Geoffrey S. Poor, Beppie van den Bogaerde\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There exists a scarcity in signed language assessment research, especially on scoring issues and interrater reliability. This chapter describes two related assessment instruments, the SLPI and the NFA, which offer scoring criteria. Raters are provided with scales for evaluating the different components of the language production of the candidate. Through its use, the rating system has been proved successful; there is, however, hardly any data on interrater reliability. In this chapter, the authors describe reliability issues with attention to raters’ training and score resolution techniques and discuss how to identify and increase rater reliability. The dearth of knowledge on signed language assessment, and in particular its validity and reliability, indicates an urgent need for more research in this area.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Handbook of Language Assessment Across Modalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在手语语言评估方面的研究还很缺乏,尤其是在评分问题和译者信度方面的研究。本章描述了两种相关的评估工具,SLPI和NFA,它们提供了评分标准。评判员提供了评估候选人语言生产的不同组成部分的量表。通过使用,证明了该评级系统是成功的;然而,几乎没有任何关于互译器可靠性的数据。在本章中,作者描述了可靠性问题,关注评分员的培训和评分解决技术,并讨论了如何识别和提高评分员的可靠性。由于对手语评估,特别是对其效度和信度的认识不足,迫切需要在这一领域进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scoring Second Signed Language Assessment
There exists a scarcity in signed language assessment research, especially on scoring issues and interrater reliability. This chapter describes two related assessment instruments, the SLPI and the NFA, which offer scoring criteria. Raters are provided with scales for evaluating the different components of the language production of the candidate. Through its use, the rating system has been proved successful; there is, however, hardly any data on interrater reliability. In this chapter, the authors describe reliability issues with attention to raters’ training and score resolution techniques and discuss how to identify and increase rater reliability. The dearth of knowledge on signed language assessment, and in particular its validity and reliability, indicates an urgent need for more research in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信