需求管理场景中时间序列预测的统计和机器学习方法比较

Anton Pfeifer, Hendrik Brand, V. Lohweg
{"title":"需求管理场景中时间序列预测的统计和机器学习方法比较","authors":"Anton Pfeifer, Hendrik Brand, V. Lohweg","doi":"10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing size and complexity of datasets, the need for constant adaptation to current conditions, and the potential benefits of machine learning (ML) techniques, such as flexibility and the ability to incorporate additional features, have led to the increasing use of ML techniques in forecasting as an alternative to traditional statistical methods. However, the results are often not transferable to smaller datasets. This paper analyses a real inventory management dataset and compares statistical and ML methods to determine which techniques consistently produce accurate results, even for smaller datasets. The results show that the choice of aggregation level affects the performance of statistical and ML methods, with the LightGBM model showing consistent performance across different scenarios and aggregation levels, and simpler methods effectively modelling intermittent or lumpy time series.","PeriodicalId":174443,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in a Demand Management Scenario\",\"authors\":\"Anton Pfeifer, Hendrik Brand, V. Lohweg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing size and complexity of datasets, the need for constant adaptation to current conditions, and the potential benefits of machine learning (ML) techniques, such as flexibility and the ability to incorporate additional features, have led to the increasing use of ML techniques in forecasting as an alternative to traditional statistical methods. However, the results are often not transferable to smaller datasets. This paper analyses a real inventory management dataset and compares statistical and ML methods to determine which techniques consistently produce accurate results, even for smaller datasets. The results show that the choice of aggregation level affects the performance of statistical and ML methods, with the LightGBM model showing consistent performance across different scenarios and aggregation levels, and simpler methods effectively modelling intermittent or lumpy time series.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 21st International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10218206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数据集的规模和复杂性不断增加,需要不断适应当前条件,以及机器学习(ML)技术的潜在好处,例如灵活性和整合额外功能的能力,导致ML技术越来越多地用于预测,作为传统统计方法的替代方案。然而,结果往往不能转移到较小的数据集。本文分析了一个真实的库存管理数据集,并比较了统计方法和机器学习方法,以确定哪种技术始终产生准确的结果,即使对于较小的数据集也是如此。结果表明,聚合级别的选择会影响统计和ML方法的性能,LightGBM模型在不同场景和聚合级别上表现出一致的性能,而更简单的方法可以有效地建模间歇性或块状时间序列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches for Time Series Forecasting in a Demand Management Scenario
The increasing size and complexity of datasets, the need for constant adaptation to current conditions, and the potential benefits of machine learning (ML) techniques, such as flexibility and the ability to incorporate additional features, have led to the increasing use of ML techniques in forecasting as an alternative to traditional statistical methods. However, the results are often not transferable to smaller datasets. This paper analyses a real inventory management dataset and compares statistical and ML methods to determine which techniques consistently produce accurate results, even for smaller datasets. The results show that the choice of aggregation level affects the performance of statistical and ML methods, with the LightGBM model showing consistent performance across different scenarios and aggregation levels, and simpler methods effectively modelling intermittent or lumpy time series.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信