{"title":"威廉·斯坦利·杰文斯对亚当·斯密和罗伯特·坎蒂永的错误比较——忽视了风险与不确定性的鸿沟。","authors":"M. E. Brady","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2641213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"William Stanley Jevons’ misevaluated Adam Smith’s contributions in the Wealth of Nations in 1881 by overlooking the originality of Smith’s unique contributions to decision theory, his definition of uncertainty, and his application of the uncertainty versus risk distinction in Smith’s analysis of occupational choice in chapter 10 of Part I of the Wealth of Nations.","PeriodicalId":399171,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Science eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"William Stanley Jevons' Erroneous Comparison of Adam Smith and Robert Cantillon - Overlooking the Risk versus Uncertainty Divide.\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2641213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"William Stanley Jevons’ misevaluated Adam Smith’s contributions in the Wealth of Nations in 1881 by overlooking the originality of Smith’s unique contributions to decision theory, his definition of uncertainty, and his application of the uncertainty versus risk distinction in Smith’s analysis of occupational choice in chapter 10 of Part I of the Wealth of Nations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophy of Science eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophy of Science eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Science eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2641213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
William Stanley Jevons' Erroneous Comparison of Adam Smith and Robert Cantillon - Overlooking the Risk versus Uncertainty Divide.
William Stanley Jevons’ misevaluated Adam Smith’s contributions in the Wealth of Nations in 1881 by overlooking the originality of Smith’s unique contributions to decision theory, his definition of uncertainty, and his application of the uncertainty versus risk distinction in Smith’s analysis of occupational choice in chapter 10 of Part I of the Wealth of Nations.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
