提高透明度的工具?拉丁美洲有效公民技术的制度障碍

Rebecca Rumbul
{"title":"提高透明度的工具?拉丁美洲有效公民技术的制度障碍","authors":"Rebecca Rumbul","doi":"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital NGOs design and popularise tools to open up, and enable citizens to interact with, decision-makers. The successful operation of such platforms depends on the expertise and efficiency of the NGO, and the willingness of institutions to disclose usable information. It is this institutional interaction with civic technology that this paper seeks to explore. This paper examines the empirical interview data gathered from government officials, public servants, campaigners and NGO's involved in the development and implementation of civic technologies in Chile, Argentina and Mexico. The findings identify the impact that civic technology has had upon government bureaucracy, and the barriers to openness created by institutionalised behaviours and norms. Institutionalised attitudes to information rights and conventions are shown to inform the approach that government bureaucracy takes in the provision of information / data, and institutionalised procedural behaviour is shown to be a factor in frustrating NGOs attempting to implement civic technology.","PeriodicalId":399705,"journal":{"name":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","volume":"61 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tools for Transparency? Institutional Barriers to Effective Civic Technology in Latin America\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Rumbul\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CeDEM.2016.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital NGOs design and popularise tools to open up, and enable citizens to interact with, decision-makers. The successful operation of such platforms depends on the expertise and efficiency of the NGO, and the willingness of institutions to disclose usable information. It is this institutional interaction with civic technology that this paper seeks to explore. This paper examines the empirical interview data gathered from government officials, public servants, campaigners and NGO's involved in the development and implementation of civic technologies in Chile, Argentina and Mexico. The findings identify the impact that civic technology has had upon government bureaucracy, and the barriers to openness created by institutionalised behaviours and norms. Institutionalised attitudes to information rights and conventions are shown to inform the approach that government bureaucracy takes in the provision of information / data, and institutionalised procedural behaviour is shown to be a factor in frustrating NGOs attempting to implement civic technology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":399705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CeDEM.2016.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

数字非政府组织设计和推广工具,使公民能够与决策者互动。这些平台的成功运行,取决于NGO的专业能力和效率,以及机构是否愿意披露有用的信息。本文试图探讨的正是这种与公民技术的制度互动。本文研究了从智利、阿根廷和墨西哥参与公民技术开发和实施的政府官员、公务员、活动家和非政府组织中收集的实证访谈数据。调查结果确定了公民技术对政府官僚主义的影响,以及制度化行为和规范对开放造成的障碍。对信息权利和公约的制度化态度表明,政府官僚机构在提供信息/数据方面采取的方法,而制度化的程序行为表明,这是阻碍非政府组织试图实施公民技术的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tools for Transparency? Institutional Barriers to Effective Civic Technology in Latin America
Digital NGOs design and popularise tools to open up, and enable citizens to interact with, decision-makers. The successful operation of such platforms depends on the expertise and efficiency of the NGO, and the willingness of institutions to disclose usable information. It is this institutional interaction with civic technology that this paper seeks to explore. This paper examines the empirical interview data gathered from government officials, public servants, campaigners and NGO's involved in the development and implementation of civic technologies in Chile, Argentina and Mexico. The findings identify the impact that civic technology has had upon government bureaucracy, and the barriers to openness created by institutionalised behaviours and norms. Institutionalised attitudes to information rights and conventions are shown to inform the approach that government bureaucracy takes in the provision of information / data, and institutionalised procedural behaviour is shown to be a factor in frustrating NGOs attempting to implement civic technology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信